EIFGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
EIFGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 7, 2011. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
EIFGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIFGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund | -11.94% | 14.48% | 42.07% | 42.23% | -32.01% | 16.33% | 44.64% | 35.77% | 0.68% | -0.63% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIFGX achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
EIFGX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -10.43%
- 1Y
- 10.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIFGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIFGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIFGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
EIFGX
SWLGX
EIFGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIFGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 0.66 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 1.10 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.72 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.95 | 2.51 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIFGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.66 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.68 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIFGX and SWLGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EIFGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
EIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.76%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund | 28.76% | 25.32% | 10.78% | 2.74% | 32.69% | 16.44% | 8.74% | 9.36% | 10.11% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 1.25% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EIFGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIFGX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIFGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -32.69% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.60% | -16.16% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -32.69% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | -16.16% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -7.13% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 4.62% | -0.60% |
Volatility
EIFGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) have volatilities of 5.22% and 5.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIFGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 5.38% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 11.82% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.64% | 22.31% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 21.47% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 22.78% | -1.10% |