EIFGX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
EIFGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 7, 2011. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
EIFGX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIFGX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund | -11.94% | 14.48% | 42.07% | 42.23% | -32.01% | 16.33% | 44.64% | 35.77% | 0.68% | 25.44% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIFGX achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFGX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 15.58%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.43% annualized return.
EIFGX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -10.43%
- 1Y
- 10.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIFGX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIFGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIFGX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
EIFGX
FCGSX
EIFGX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIFGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 1.40 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 2.02 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 2.25 | -1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.95 | 10.23 | -8.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIFGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.40 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.61 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.93 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.87 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIFGX and FCGSX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EIFGX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
EIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.76%, more than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund | 28.76% | 25.32% | 10.78% | 2.74% | 32.69% | 16.44% | 8.74% | 9.36% | 10.11% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 1.25% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
EIFGX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIFGX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFGX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIFGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -38.77% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.60% | -13.10% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -38.77% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.93% | -38.77% | +1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | -10.42% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -7.05% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 2.88% | +1.14% |
Volatility
EIFGX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) is 5.22%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that EIFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIFGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 6.66% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 13.74% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.64% | 23.80% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 23.62% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 23.15% | -1.47% |