EHSTX vs. LBWIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EHSTX (Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund) and LBWIX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX returned 11.15%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for LBWIX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. EHSTX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for LBWIX.

Performance

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EHSTX having a 17.25% return and LBWIX slightly lower at 16.46%. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has underperformed LBWIX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while LBWIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.

EHSTX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 2.49%
• 6M: 12.18%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 1Y: 27.96%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: 11.15%
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

LBWIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.18%
• 6M: 12.32%
• YTD: 16.46%
• 1Y: 29.46%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: 12.41%
• ALL TIME*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LBWIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	17.25%	12.11%	11.25%	7.93%	-2.80%	24.25%	2.29%	30.84%	-6.96%	14.79%
LBWIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund	16.46%	17.38%	18.59%	7.42%	-1.56%	29.74%	-1.41%	25.66%	-9.05%	17.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EHSTX and LBWIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.95

The correlation between EHSTX and LBWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EHSTX vs. LBWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EHSTX

EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 87
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

LBWIX

LBWIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
LBWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LBWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LBWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LBWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LBWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EHSTX	LBWIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.53	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.69	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.45	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	4.03	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.77	14.63	-1.86

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the LBWIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHSTX and LBWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than LBWIX's maximum drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and LBWIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHSTX	LBWIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.47%	-38.22%	-15.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-6.80%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.44%	-14.05%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.44%	-17.87%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.30%	-38.22%	-1.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-1.18%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-3.91%	-3.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.87%	+0.12%

Volatility

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) is 2.71%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that EHSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EHSTX	LBWIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	3.07%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	8.03%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	10.87%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	14.68%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	17.78%	-0.53%

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than LBWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

EHSTX vs. LBWIX - Dividend Comparison

EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than LBWIX's 10.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	5.16%	6.12%	4.03%	2.93%	4.25%	7.32%	1.94%	2.76%	10.94%	5.88%	1.33%	11.02%
LBWIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund	10.69%	12.45%	11.18%	1.90%	13.87%	16.48%	2.89%	11.13%	11.30%	6.47%	6.95%	6.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHSTX and LBWIX in my portfolio?

EHSTX and LBWIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EHSTX or LBWIX?

LBWIX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to EHSTX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHSTX dropped -53.47% vs LBWIX's -38.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LBWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.