PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFGX vs. E
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIFGX vs. E - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFGX achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than E's 31.38% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFGX has outperformed E with an annualized return of 17.75%, while E has yielded a comparatively lower 11.45% annualized return.


EIFGX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.28%
1Y
16.93%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
17.75%

E

1D
-1.38%
1M
-10.42%
YTD
31.38%
6M
31.79%
1Y
59.48%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFGX vs. E - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIFGX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund
4.12%14.48%42.07%42.23%-32.01%16.33%44.64%35.77%0.68%25.44%
E
Eni S.p.A.
31.38%48.40%-13.95%26.73%10.92%43.12%-28.73%4.29%-0.98%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFGX and E is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.35

The correlation between EIFGX and E shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIFGX vs. E — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFGX
EIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
EIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

E
E Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
E Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
E Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
E Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
E Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFGX vs. E - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIFGXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

4.13

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

17.38

-12.99

EIFGX vs. E - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the E Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFGX and E, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIFGX vs. E - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFGX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum E drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFGX and E.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFGXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-70.53%

+33.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.60%

-14.47%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.85%

-20.13%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.93%

-33.71%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.93%

-61.59%

+24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

-14.47%

+9.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-23.06%

+17.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

3.43%

+0.69%

Volatility

EIFGX vs. E - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) is 5.51%, while Eni S.p.A. (E) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that EIFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIFGXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

6.95%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

20.13%

-7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

23.33%

-7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.14%

25.04%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

28.08%

-6.29%

Dividends

EIFGX vs. E - Dividend Comparison

EIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.32%, more than E's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
E
Eni S.p.A.
4.94%5.88%7.69%5.74%6.38%5.79%5.91%6.11%5.15%3.96%3.98%5.14%
EIFGX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund
24.32%25.32%10.78%2.74%32.69%16.44%8.74%9.36%10.11%0.29%0.00%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIFGX and E have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

E has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to EIFGX (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFGX dropped -36.93% vs E's -70.53%.

E currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIFGX and E

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer