EIFGX vs. E

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eni S.p.A. (E).

EIFGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 7, 2011.

Performance

EIFGX vs. E - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EIFGX vs. E - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund	-8.66%	14.48%	42.07%	42.23%	-32.01%	16.33%	44.64%	35.77%	0.68%	25.44%
E Eni S.p.A.	46.33%	48.40%	-13.95%	26.73%	10.92%	43.12%	-28.73%	4.29%	-0.98%	7.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFGX achieves a -8.66% return, which is significantly lower than E's 46.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFGX has outperformed E with an annualized return of 16.00%, while E has yielded a comparatively lower 13.09% annualized return.

EIFGX

• 1D: 3.72%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: -8.66%
• 6M: -7.59%
• 1Y: 13.73%
• 3Y*: 22.98%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 16.00%

E

• 1D: -3.06%
• 1M: 17.23%
• YTD: 46.33%
• 6M: 60.88%
• 1Y: 87.18%
• 3Y*: 33.52%
• 5Y*: 25.32%
• 10Y*: 13.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EIFGX vs. E — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFGX

EIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
EIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

E

E Risk / Return Rank: 96
E Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
E Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
E Omega Ratio Rank: 97
E Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
E Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFGX vs. E - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIFGX	E	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	3.57	-2.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	4.01	-2.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.60	-0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	4.61	-3.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.60	22.02	-18.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIFGX vs. E - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the E Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFGX and E, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIFGX	E	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	3.57	-2.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	1.03	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.47	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.32	+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between EIFGX and E is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EIFGX vs. E - Dividend Comparison

EIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.73%, more than E's 4.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund	27.73%	25.32%	10.78%	2.74%	32.69%	16.44%	8.74%	9.36%	10.11%	0.29%	0.00%	1.25%
E Eni S.p.A.	4.24%	5.88%	7.69%	5.74%	6.38%	5.79%	5.91%	6.11%	5.15%	3.96%	3.98%	5.14%

Drawdowns

EIFGX vs. E - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFGX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum E drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFGX and E.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIFGX	E	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.93%	-70.53%	+33.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.60%	-19.11%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.93%	-33.71%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.93%	-61.59%	+24.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.42%	-3.06%	-8.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.95%	-23.19%	+17.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	4.04%	+0.05%

Volatility

EIFGX vs. E - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) is 6.60%, while Eni S.p.A. (E) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that EIFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIFGX	E	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	8.16%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.05%	15.94%	-3.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.91%	24.53%	-2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.06%	24.65%	-2.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	28.22%	-6.51%