EHSTX vs. EAEMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EHSTX (Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund) and EAEMX (Parametric Emerging Markets Fund) are both mutual funds - EHSTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EAEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX returned 11.05%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for EAEMX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EHSTX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for EAEMX.

Performance

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EHSTX having a 12.75% return and EAEMX slightly lower at 12.25%. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has outperformed EAEMX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while EAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.

EHSTX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 23.62%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

EAEMX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 2.48%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 12.83%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 7.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	12.75%	12.11%	11.25%	7.93%	-2.80%	24.25%	2.29%	30.84%	-6.96%	14.79%
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	12.25%	27.16%	5.39%	9.46%	-11.27%	4.19%	2.65%	12.32%	-14.02%	27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EHSTX and EAEMX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2006	0.70

The correlation between EHSTX and EAEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EHSTX vs. EAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHSTX

EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 58
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

EAEMX

EAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 73
EAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
EAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EHSTX	EAEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.45	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.31	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.49	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	3.05	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.57	11.00	+0.57

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the EAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHSTX and EAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum EAEMX drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and EAEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHSTX	EAEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.47%	-62.70%	+9.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-9.90%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.44%	-11.74%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.44%	-24.73%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.30%	-44.16%	+4.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.87%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-13.45%	+6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.74%	-0.68%

Volatility

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) is 4.15%, while Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that EHSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EHSTX	EAEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	5.07%	-0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	10.83%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	12.33%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.78%	11.75%	+3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	13.46%	+3.85%

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EAEMX's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

EHSTX vs. EAEMX - Dividend Comparison

EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than EAEMX's 2.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	2.52%	2.83%	3.00%	2.71%	4.40%	1.64%	1.08%	2.48%	2.14%	2.31%	1.52%	1.68%
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	5.37%	6.12%	4.03%	2.93%	4.25%	7.32%	1.94%	2.76%	10.94%	5.88%	1.33%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHSTX and EAEMX in my portfolio?

EHSTX and EAEMX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EHSTX or EAEMX?

EAEMX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to EHSTX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHSTX dropped -53.47% vs EAEMX's -62.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.