EFXT vs. UGA
EFXT (Enerflex Ltd.) is a stock, while UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Over the past 10 years, EFXT returned 14.46%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for UGA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFXT vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFXT achieves a 68.34% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFXT having a 14.46% annualized return and UGA not far behind at 14.43%.
EFXT
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 68.34%
- 6M
- 89.05%
- 1Y
- 248.58%
- 3Y*
- 64.38%
- 5Y*
- 32.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
UGA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- 75.49%
- 6M
- 64.35%
- 1Y
- 80.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
EFXT vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 68.34% | 57.04% | 115.79% | -25.13% | 5.83% | 15.59% | -42.16% | -17.32% | -2.49% | -1.70% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.49% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFXT and UGA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2011 | 0.18 |
The correlation between EFXT and UGA shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFXT vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
EFXT
UGA
EFXT vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFXT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.37 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.03 | 5.47 | +11.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 56.79 | 13.25 | +43.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFXT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04 | 2.32 | +3.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.73 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.39 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.12 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
EFXT vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFXT drawdown since its inception was -81.64%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFXT and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFXT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.64% | -86.59% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -14.88% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.26% | -26.68% | -24.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.16% | -38.11% | -18.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.04% | -75.89% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.63% | -12.35% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.32% | -36.76% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 6.13% | -1.73% |
Volatility
EFXT vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) have volatilities of 11.75% and 11.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFXT | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.75% | 11.66% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.77% | 30.41% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.61% | 35.14% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.81% | 34.38% | +14.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.04% | 37.27% | +10.77% |
Dividends
EFXT vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
EFXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 0.46% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.14% | 2.42% | 3.43% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.67% | 3.55% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFXT and UGA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFXT has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to UGA (11.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFXT dropped -81.64% vs UGA's -86.59%.
EFXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.04 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFXT and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer