PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PRG vs. TT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PRG and TT is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

PRG vs. TT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-5.77%
4.85%
PRG
TT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRG:

0.71

TT:

1.47

Sortino Ratio

PRG:

1.37

TT:

1.92

Omega Ratio

PRG:

1.17

TT:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

PRG:

0.52

TT:

2.29

Martin Ratio

PRG:

3.45

TT:

6.73

Ulcer Index

PRG:

8.53%

TT:

5.11%

Daily Std Dev

PRG:

41.44%

TT:

23.51%

Max Drawdown

PRG:

-80.87%

TT:

-77.92%

Current Drawdown

PRG:

-34.45%

TT:

-13.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRG:

$1.77B

TT:

$81.48B

EPS

PRG:

$3.61

TT:

$11.33

PE Ratio

PRG:

11.83

TT:

32.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRG:

$1.84B

TT:

$19.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRG:

$608.22M

TT:

$7.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRG:

$1.39B

TT:

$3.87B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRG achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than TT's -1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PRG has underperformed TT with an annualized return of 5.41%, while TT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.32% annualized return.


PRG

YTD

1.02%

1M

-0.97%

6M

-5.77%

1Y

38.92%

5Y*

2.41%

10Y*

5.41%

TT

YTD

-1.74%

1M

-6.75%

6M

4.85%

1Y

34.69%

5Y*

28.25%

10Y*

23.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRG vs. TT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRG is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRG is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRG is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRG is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRG is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRG is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TT is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TT is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TT is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TT is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TT is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TT is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRG vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRG, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.711.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRG, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.371.92
The chart of Omega ratio for PRG, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.171.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRG, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.522.29
The chart of Martin ratio for PRG, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.456.73
PRG
TT

The current PRG Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the TT Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRG and TT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.71
1.47
PRG
TT

Dividends

PRG vs. TT - Dividend Comparison

PRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than TT's 0.93% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PRG
PROG Holdings, Inc.
1.12%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.25%0.30%0.28%0.32%0.42%0.28%
TT
Trane Technologies plc
0.93%0.91%1.23%1.59%1.17%1.46%1.59%2.15%1.91%1.81%2.10%1.58%

Drawdowns

PRG vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRG drawdown since its inception was -80.87%, roughly equal to the maximum TT drawdown of -77.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRG and TT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-34.45%
-13.24%
PRG
TT

Volatility

PRG vs. TT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) is 6.63%, while Trane Technologies plc (TT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that PRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.63%
9.50%
PRG
TT

Financials

PRG vs. TT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PROG Holdings, Inc. and Trane Technologies plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab