PRG vs. NVDA
PRG (PROG Holdings, Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. PRG operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PRG returned 8.74%/yr vs 64.62%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PRG vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRG achieves a 50.60% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PRG has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 8.74%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.
PRG
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- YTD
- 50.60%
- 1Y
- 46.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.88%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B | |
| $25.64M | $22.44M | $21.41M |
PRG vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRG PROG Holdings, Inc. | 50.60% | -28.95% | 38.41% | 83.01% | -62.56% | -16.26% | 11.71% | 36.15% | 5.81% | 24.96% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRG and NVDA is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.21 |
The correlation between PRG and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRG:
$1.76B
NVDA:
$4.86T
PRG:
$3.61
NVDA:
$6.53
PRG:
12.20
NVDA:
30.73
PRG:
1.14
NVDA:
0.17
PRG:
0.72
NVDA:
19.35
PRG:
2.23
NVDA:
25.05
PRG:
$2.48B
NVDA:
$253.49B
PRG:
$893.15M
NVDA:
$187.95B
PRG:
$981.94M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRG vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
PRG
NVDA
PRG vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRG | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.09 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 0.65 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 1.32 | +1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRG vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRG drawdown since its inception was -80.87%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRG and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRG | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.87% | -89.72% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.21% | -20.21% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.86% | -36.88% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.96% | -66.34% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.87% | -66.34% | -14.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.58% | -14.74% | -15.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.44% | -36.07% | +7.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.34% | 9.90% | +5.44% |
Volatility
PRG vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) is 10.69%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that PRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRG | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 12.04% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.70% | 28.30% | +10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.91% | 36.41% | +9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.93% | 51.87% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.90% | 49.95% | -0.05% |
Dividends
PRG vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
PRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
PRG PROG Holdings, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.76% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.32% | 0.42% |
Financials
PRG vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PROG Holdings, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRG vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
PRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.34M and revenue of 564.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
PRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 73.93M and revenue of 564.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
PRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 37.03M and revenue of 564.80M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRG and NVDA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to PRG (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRG dropped -80.87% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
PRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRG and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer