PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPIH vs. XGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PPIH vs. XGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH) and Exagen Inc. (XGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPIH achieves a -20.45% return, which is significantly higher than XGN's -25.49% return.


PPIH

1D
-0.45%
1M
-5.15%
6M
-16.38%
YTD
-20.45%
1Y
14.45%
3Y*
45.13%
5Y*
28.51%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
13.22%

XGN

1D
-3.00%
1M
-0.22%
6M
23.10%
YTD
-25.49%
1Y
-47.51%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
-17.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.71M$1.85M$3.38M
$1.07M$1.02M$1.70M

PPIH vs. XGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PPIH
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.
-20.45%103.08%88.36%-16.01%8.87%42.53%-35.07%3.99%
XGN
Exagen Inc.
-25.49%48.29%106.03%-17.08%-79.36%-11.89%-48.03%51.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PPIH and XGN is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019

0.07

The correlation between PPIH and XGN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PPIH:

$196.24M

XGN:

$109.44M

EPS

PPIH:

$1.69

XGN:

-$0.89

PS Ratio

PPIH:

0.92

XGN:

1.51

PB Ratio

PPIH:

2.16

XGN:

7.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

PPIH:

$214.44M

XGN:

$68.38M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PPIH:

$67.40M

XGN:

$39.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

PPIH:

$30.14M

XGN:

-$15.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPIH vs. XGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPIH
PPIH Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PPIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPIH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PPIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPIH Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XGN
XGN Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGN Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPIH vs. XGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH) and Exagen Inc. (XGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPIHXGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.91

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

-0.59

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

-0.86

+1.41

PPIH vs. XGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPIH Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the XGN Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPIH and XGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPIH vs. XGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPIH drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, smaller than the maximum XGN drawdown of -95.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPIH and XGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPIHXGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-95.22%

+36.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.17%

-77.84%

+43.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.77%

-77.84%

+32.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.53%

-90.58%

+32.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.57%

-84.09%

+52.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-71.09%

+50.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.45%

53.41%

-36.96%

Volatility

PPIH vs. XGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH) is 12.56%, while Exagen Inc. (XGN) has a volatility of 23.42%. This indicates that PPIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPIHXGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.56%

23.42%

-10.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.83%

60.11%

-19.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.77%

71.60%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.11%

83.50%

-25.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.48%

88.27%

-40.79%

Dividends

PPIH vs. XGN - Dividend Comparison

Neither PPIH nor XGN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PPIH vs. XGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. and Exagen Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PPIH vs. XGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. and Exagen Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PPIH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 50.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.1%.

XGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exagen Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.21M and revenue of 17.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

PPIH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.64M and revenue of 50.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

XGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exagen Inc. reported an operating income of -3.41M and revenue of 17.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.7%.

PPIH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.80M and revenue of 50.27M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

XGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exagen Inc. reported a net income of -3.97M and revenue of 17.31M, resulting in a net margin of -22.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PPIH and XGN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XGN has higher volatility (23.42%) compared to PPIH (12.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPIH dropped -58.53% vs XGN's -95.22%.

PPIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPIH and XGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer