PPIH vs. MG
PPIH (Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.) and MG (Mistras Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PPIH in Building Products & Equipment, MG in Security & Protection Services. Over the past 10 years, PPIH returned 15.28%/yr vs -3.21%/yr for MG. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPIH vs. MG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPIH achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than MG's 42.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PPIH has outperformed MG with an annualized return of 15.28%, while MG has yielded a comparatively lower -3.21% annualized return.
PPIH
- 1D
- 4.99%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 27.47%
- 1Y
- 141.09%
- 3Y*
- 46.43%
- 5Y*
- 36.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
MG
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 42.61%
- 6M
- 54.19%
- 1Y
- 141.18%
- 3Y*
- 37.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- -3.21%
PPIH vs. MG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPIH Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. | 7.44% | 103.08% | 88.36% | -16.01% | 8.87% | 42.53% | -35.07% | 7.20% | -2.78% | 11.11% |
MG Mistras Group, Inc. | 42.61% | 39.62% | 23.77% | 48.48% | -33.65% | -4.25% | -45.62% | -0.76% | -38.73% | -8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPIH and MG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.06 |
The correlation between PPIH and MG shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PPIH:
$267.68M
MG:
$589.10M
PPIH:
$2.08
MG:
$0.70
PPIH:
15.65
MG:
25.87
PPIH:
0.42
MG:
0.53
PPIH:
1.26
MG:
0.79
PPIH:
$210.93M
MG:
$731.44M
PPIH:
$69.49M
MG:
$197.97M
PPIH:
$32.25M
MG:
$75.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPIH vs. MG — Risk / Return Rank
PPIH
MG
PPIH vs. MG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH) and Mistras Group, Inc. (MG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPIH | MG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 3.46 | -1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 4.71 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.58 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 9.56 | -4.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 28.63 | -17.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPIH | MG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 3.46 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.24 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | -0.06 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.05 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
PPIH vs. MG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPIH drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, smaller than the maximum MG drawdown of -89.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPIH and MG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPIH | MG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -89.21% | +30.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.45% | -14.54% | -16.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.77% | -40.78% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.53% | -66.87% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.53% | -88.95% | +30.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | -33.09% | +25.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.57% | -40.51% | +19.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.91% | 4.85% | +8.06% |
Volatility
PPIH vs. MG - Volatility Comparison
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH) has a higher volatility of 13.64% compared to Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) at 12.26%. This indicates that PPIH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPIH | MG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.64% | 12.26% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.10% | 24.20% | +12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.36% | 41.07% | +29.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.31% | 46.19% | +11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.07% | 51.29% | -4.22% |
Dividends
PPIH vs. MG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPIH nor MG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PPIH vs. MG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. and Mistras Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PPIH vs. MG - Profitability Comparison
PPIH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.34M and revenue of 55.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.
MG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mistras Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.73M and revenue of 169.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.
PPIH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.97M and revenue of 55.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
MG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mistras Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 169.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
PPIH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.92M and revenue of 55.13M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
MG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mistras Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.39M and revenue of 169.03M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPIH and MG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPIH has higher volatility (13.64%) compared to MG (12.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPIH dropped -58.53% vs MG's -89.21%.
MG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPIH and MG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer