GHM vs. ANF
GHM (Graham Corporation) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. GHM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GHM returned 20.45%/yr vs 16.76%/yr for ANF. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GHM vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHM achieves a 61.72% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -39.29% return. Over the past 10 years, GHM has outperformed ANF with an annualized return of 20.45%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively lower 16.76% annualized return.
GHM
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 61.72%
- 6M
- 81.27%
- 1Y
- 153.96%
- 3Y*
- 109.11%
- 5Y*
- 48.61%
- 10Y*
- 20.45%
ANF
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -39.29%
- 6M
- -23.28%
- 1Y
- -0.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
GHM vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 61.72% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -39.29% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHM and ANF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 1996 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GHM and ANF shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GHM:
$1.16B
ANF:
$3.49B
GHM:
$1.34
ANF:
$10.45
GHM:
77.31
ANF:
7.31
GHM:
1.51
ANF:
0.00
GHM:
4.86
ANF:
0.68
GHM:
8.83
ANF:
2.60
GHM:
$237.56M
ANF:
$5.28B
GHM:
$58.50M
ANF:
$2.56B
GHM:
$19.22M
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHM vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
GHM
ANF
GHM vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Corporation (GHM) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.06 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.51 | -0.01 | +8.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.90 | -0.02 | +20.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | -0.01 | +3.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.23 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.28 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.14 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
GHM vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHM drawdown since its inception was -86.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHM and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.11% | -86.59% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -45.65% | +27.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.46% | -65.89% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | -69.93% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.83% | -72.45% | -2.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -60.27% | +58.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.41% | -42.90% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 23.70% | -16.30% |
Volatility
GHM vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Graham Corporation (GHM) is 12.92%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 15.20%. This indicates that GHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.92% | 15.20% | -2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.59% | 38.18% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.73% | 61.45% | -10.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.94% | 60.97% | -12.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 60.93% | -15.95% |
Dividends
GHM vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither GHM nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
Financials
GHM vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graham Corporation and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GHM vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
GHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.47M and revenue of 56.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of -219.00K and revenue of 56.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
GHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 2.85M and revenue of 56.70M, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GHM and ANF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (15.20%) compared to GHM (12.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHM dropped -86.11% vs ANF's -86.59%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHM and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer