GHM vs. ANF
GHM (Graham Corporation) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. GHM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GHM returned 19.83%/yr vs 19.65%/yr for ANF. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GHM vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHM achieves a 49.31% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -20.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GHM having a 19.83% annualized return and ANF not far behind at 19.65%.
GHM
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -16.91%
- 6M
- 37.16%
- YTD
- 49.31%
- 1Y
- 72.76%
- 3Y*
- 90.51%
- 5Y*
- 48.08%
- 10Y*
- 19.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.75%
ANF
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -20.92%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 36.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.36%
- 10Y*
- 19.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $85.39M | $92.43M | $110.00M | |
| $20.82M | $25.94M | $28.36M |
GHM vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 49.31% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -20.92% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHM and ANF is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1996 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GHM and ANF shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GHM:
$1.12B
ANF:
$4.42B
GHM:
$1.12
ANF:
$10.45
GHM:
85.49
ANF:
9.52
GHM:
0.29
ANF:
0.00
GHM:
4.36
ANF:
0.89
GHM:
7.61
ANF:
3.39
GHM:
$245.29M
ANF:
$5.28B
GHM:
$57.75M
ANF:
$2.56B
GHM:
$14.76M
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHM vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
GHM
ANF
GHM vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Corporation (GHM) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.08 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.74 | 0.14 | +7.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHM vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHM drawdown since its inception was -86.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHM and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.11% | -86.59% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.68% | -45.65% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.46% | -65.89% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.86% | -69.93% | +18.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.83% | -72.45% | -2.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.53% | -48.25% | +25.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.23% | -42.94% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.79% | 26.57% | -17.78% |
Volatility
GHM vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
Graham Corporation (GHM) has a higher volatility of 19.48% compared to Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) at 13.97%. This indicates that GHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.48% | 13.97% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.03% | 34.42% | +7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.93% | 62.38% | -6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.30% | 61.21% | -10.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.61% | 61.07% | -15.46% |
Dividends
GHM vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither GHM nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
Financials
GHM vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graham Corporation and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GHM vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
GHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.69M and revenue of 67.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of 1.72M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.6%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
GHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 1.97M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GHM and ANF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (19.48%) compared to ANF (13.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHM dropped -86.11% vs ANF's -86.59%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHM and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer