GHM vs. QTEC
GHM (Graham Corporation) is a stock, while QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, GHM returned 22.34%/yr vs 23.50%/yr for QTEC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GHM vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHM achieves a 91.23% return, which is significantly higher than QTEC's 40.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GHM has underperformed QTEC with an annualized return of 22.34%, while QTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 23.50% annualized return.
GHM
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 22.83%
- YTD
- 91.23%
- 6M
- 73.96%
- 1Y
- 155.90%
- 3Y*
- 112.50%
- 5Y*
- 56.14%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
QTEC
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 40.25%
- 6M
- 37.40%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.50%
GHM vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 91.23% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 40.25% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 26.89% | 38.76% | 48.22% | -4.62% | 37.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHM and QTEC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2006 | 0.39 |
The correlation between GHM and QTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHM vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank
GHM
QTEC
GHM vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Corporation (GHM) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHM | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.61 | 3.35 | +5.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.86 | 10.49 | +10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHM vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHM drawdown since its inception was -86.11%, which is greater than QTEC's maximum drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHM and QTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHM | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.11% | -58.86% | -27.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -16.03% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.46% | -29.00% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.63% | -45.54% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.83% | -45.54% | -29.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.83% | +3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.33% | -9.87% | -37.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.50% | 5.10% | +2.40% |
Volatility
GHM vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison
Graham Corporation (GHM) has a higher volatility of 20.78% compared to First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) at 14.21%. This indicates that GHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHM | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.78% | 14.21% | +6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.95% | 21.98% | +17.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.88% | 26.11% | +26.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.63% | 29.73% | +19.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.36% | 27.75% | +17.61% |
Dividends
GHM vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison
GHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHM and QTEC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (20.78%) compared to QTEC (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHM dropped -86.11% vs QTEC's -58.86%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHM and QTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer