PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHM vs. QTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHM vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Graham Corporation (GHM) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHM achieves a 71.57% return, which is significantly higher than QTEC's 35.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GHM has underperformed QTEC with an annualized return of 20.39%, while QTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.78% annualized return.


GHM

1D
2.94%
1M
2.44%
6M
51.67%
YTD
71.57%
1Y
117.19%
3Y*
105.17%
5Y*
52.95%
10Y*
20.39%

QTEC

1D
-1.13%
1M
-6.54%
6M
32.27%
YTD
35.78%
1Y
45.69%
3Y*
27.28%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
21.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHM vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHM
Graham Corporation
71.57%44.43%134.42%97.19%-22.67%-15.50%-28.39%-2.28%10.81%-3.80%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
35.78%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GHM and QTEC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2006

0.39

The correlation between GHM and QTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHM vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHM
GHM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHM vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Corporation (GHM) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHMQTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

2.86

+3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

8.74

+6.25

GHM vs. QTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the QTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHM and QTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHM vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHM drawdown since its inception was -86.11%, which is greater than QTEC's maximum drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHM and QTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHMQTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.11%

-58.86%

-27.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-16.03%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.46%

-29.00%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.63%

-45.54%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.83%

-45.54%

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-6.90%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.28%

-9.86%

-37.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.85%

5.24%

+2.61%

Volatility

GHM vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison

Graham Corporation (GHM) has a higher volatility of 17.91% compared to First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) at 12.00%. This indicates that GHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHMQTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.91%

12.00%

+5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.07%

23.23%

+16.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.94%

27.32%

+26.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.92%

29.93%

+19.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.41%

27.81%

+17.60%

Dividends

GHM vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

GHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHM
Graham Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.54%2.90%1.92%1.66%1.72%1.63%1.90%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.01%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHM and QTEC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHM has higher volatility (17.91%) compared to QTEC (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHM dropped -86.11% vs QTEC's -58.86%.

GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHM and QTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer