EFX.TO vs. IESC
Compare and contrast key facts about Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC).
Performance
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFX.TO Enerflex Ltd. | 37.72% | 49.76% | 136.45% | -27.27% | 12.93% | 17.98% | -44.71% | -21.19% | 6.74% | -8.14% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 24.14% | 84.70% | 175.47% | 117.81% | -24.75% | 9.00% | 76.39% | 56.90% | -2.21% | -15.66% |
Different Trading Currencies
EFX.TO is traded in CAD, while IESC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IESC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
EFX.TO:
CA$3.58B
IESC:
$9.61B
EFX.TO:
CA$0.73
IESC:
$19.53
EFX.TO:
40.01
IESC:
24.40
EFX.TO:
1.41
IESC:
0.29
EFX.TO:
1.00
IESC:
2.75
EFX.TO:
2.39
IESC:
10.00
EFX.TO:
CA$3.59B
IESC:
$3.49B
EFX.TO:
CA$779.69M
IESC:
$901.48M
EFX.TO:
CA$658.12M
IESC:
$451.44M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFX.TO achieves a 37.72% return, which is significantly higher than IESC's 24.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EFX.TO has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 13.39%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 43.07% annualized return.
EFX.TO
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- 37.72%
- 6M
- 94.60%
- 1Y
- 164.45%
- 3Y*
- 55.39%
- 5Y*
- 29.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
IESC
- 1D
- 7.75%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 24.14%
- 6M
- 19.71%
- 1Y
- 178.96%
- 3Y*
- 124.92%
- 5Y*
- 58.12%
- 10Y*
- 43.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFX.TO vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank
EFX.TO
IESC
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFX.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.58 | 2.82 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 2.96 | +0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.01 | 8.35 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.86 | 22.77 | -3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFX.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58 | 2.82 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.12 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.92 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.50 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFX.TO and IESC is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison
EFX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFX.TO Enerflex Ltd. | 0.56% | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 1.11% | 2.67% | 3.52% | 2.44% | 2.28% | 1.99% | 2.56% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFX.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.30%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -84.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFX.TO and IESC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFX.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.30% | -98.32% | +22.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -21.80% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | -54.28% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.30% | -54.28% | -22.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.76% | -8.31% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -55.36% | +23.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 7.82% | +1.08% |
Volatility
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) is 10.03%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 22.45%. This indicates that EFX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFX.TO | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 22.45% | -12.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.21% | 50.95% | -17.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.26% | 63.85% | -17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.51% | 52.20% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.14% | 47.17% | -2.03% |
Financials
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enerflex Ltd. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFX.TO vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison
EFX.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 273.36M and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 220.02M and revenue of 870.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
EFX.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 144.23M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.73M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
EFX.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of -46.06M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 144.35M and revenue of 870.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.