EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) and Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO).
Performance
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFX.TO Enerflex Ltd. | 37.72% | 49.76% | 136.45% | -27.27% | 12.93% | 17.98% | -44.71% | -21.19% | 6.74% | -8.14% |
HPS-A.TO Hammond Power Solutions Inc | 10.13% | 25.75% | 58.01% | 310.59% | 71.98% | 46.22% | 16.10% | 39.86% | -35.72% | 56.06% |
Fundamentals
EFX.TO:
CA$3.58B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$2.09B
EFX.TO:
CA$0.73
HPS-A.TO:
CA$6.06
EFX.TO:
40.01
HPS-A.TO:
28.93
EFX.TO:
1.41
HPS-A.TO:
0.47
EFX.TO:
1.00
HPS-A.TO:
2.33
EFX.TO:
2.39
HPS-A.TO:
5.93
EFX.TO:
CA$3.59B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$898.26M
EFX.TO:
CA$779.69M
HPS-A.TO:
CA$272.32M
EFX.TO:
CA$658.12M
HPS-A.TO:
CA$122.66M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFX.TO achieves a 37.72% return, which is significantly higher than HPS-A.TO's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EFX.TO has underperformed HPS-A.TO with an annualized return of 13.39%, while HPS-A.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 43.04% annualized return.
EFX.TO
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- 37.72%
- 6M
- 94.60%
- 1Y
- 164.45%
- 3Y*
- 55.39%
- 5Y*
- 29.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
HPS-A.TO
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- -10.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 42.48%
- 1Y
- 132.25%
- 3Y*
- 67.87%
- 5Y*
- 78.89%
- 10Y*
- 43.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EFX.TO
HPS-A.TO
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) and Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFX.TO | HPS-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.58 | 2.19 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 2.76 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.39 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.01 | 4.35 | +2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.86 | 9.23 | +9.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFX.TO | HPS-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58 | 2.19 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.63 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 1.07 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.44 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFX.TO and HPS-A.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Dividend Comparison
EFX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than HPS-A.TO's 0.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFX.TO Enerflex Ltd. | 0.56% | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 1.11% | 2.67% | 3.52% | 2.44% | 2.28% | 1.99% | 2.56% |
HPS-A.TO Hammond Power Solutions Inc | 0.63% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.67% | 1.91% | 2.84% | 4.01% | 3.65% | 4.21% | 2.62% | 3.96% | 3.77% |
Drawdowns
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFX.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.30%, roughly equal to the maximum HPS-A.TO drawdown of -80.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFX.TO and HPS-A.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFX.TO | HPS-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.30% | -80.00% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -28.14% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | -54.28% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.30% | -54.28% | -22.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.76% | -18.18% | +9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -31.63% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 13.26% | -4.36% |
Volatility
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) is 10.03%, while Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO) has a volatility of 21.23%. This indicates that EFX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPS-A.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFX.TO | HPS-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 21.23% | -11.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.21% | 46.26% | -13.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.26% | 60.80% | -14.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.51% | 49.07% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.14% | 42.47% | +2.67% |
Financials
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enerflex Ltd. and Hammond Power Solutions Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFX.TO vs. HPS-A.TO - Profitability Comparison
EFX.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 273.36M and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.
HPS-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 74.31M and revenue of 254.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.
EFX.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported an operating income of 144.23M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
HPS-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 21.96M and revenue of 254.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
EFX.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enerflex Ltd. reported a net income of -46.06M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.
HPS-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported a net income of 15.20M and revenue of 254.09M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.