EFX.TO vs. CNL
Compare and contrast key facts about Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) and Collective Mining Ltd (CNL).
Performance
EFX.TO vs. CNL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFX.TO vs. CNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFX.TO Enerflex Ltd. | 37.72% | 49.76% | 89.22% |
CNL Collective Mining Ltd | 22.33% | 234.63% | 63.77% |
Different Trading Currencies
EFX.TO is traded in CAD, while CNL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
EFX.TO:
CA$3.58B
CNL:
$1.49B
EFX.TO:
CA$0.73
CNL:
-$0.56
EFX.TO:
2.39
CNL:
24.51
EFX.TO:
CA$3.59B
CNL:
$0.00
EFX.TO:
CA$779.69M
CNL:
-$314.79K
EFX.TO:
CA$658.12M
CNL:
-$44.95M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFX.TO achieves a 37.72% return, which is significantly higher than CNL's 22.33% return.
EFX.TO
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- 37.72%
- 6M
- 94.60%
- 1Y
- 164.45%
- 3Y*
- 55.39%
- 5Y*
- 29.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
CNL
- 1D
- 9.53%
- 1M
- -13.50%
- YTD
- 22.33%
- 6M
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- 95.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFX.TO vs. CNL — Risk / Return Rank
EFX.TO
CNL
EFX.TO vs. CNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) and Collective Mining Ltd (CNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFX.TO | CNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.58 | 1.44 | +2.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 2.02 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.24 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.01 | 3.10 | +3.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.86 | 6.70 | +12.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFX.TO | CNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58 | 1.44 | +2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 3.32 | -3.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFX.TO and CNL is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFX.TO vs. CNL - Dividend Comparison
EFX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while CNL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFX.TO Enerflex Ltd. | 0.56% | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 1.11% | 2.67% | 3.52% | 2.44% | 2.28% | 1.99% | 2.56% |
CNL Collective Mining Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFX.TO vs. CNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFX.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.30%, which is greater than CNL's maximum drawdown of -32.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFX.TO and CNL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFX.TO | CNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.30% | -33.29% | -43.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -33.29% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.76% | -15.17% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -9.17% | -23.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 15.41% | -6.51% |
Volatility
EFX.TO vs. CNL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enerflex Ltd. (EFX.TO) is 10.03%, while Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) has a volatility of 27.15%. This indicates that EFX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFX.TO | CNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 27.15% | -17.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.21% | 52.90% | -19.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.26% | 67.19% | -20.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.51% | 63.48% | -17.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.14% | 63.48% | -18.34% |
Financials
EFX.TO vs. CNL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enerflex Ltd. and Collective Mining Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities