EFV vs. IWN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index, while IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFV returned 9.83%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for IWN. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.

Performance

EFV vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 18.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFV having a 9.83% annualized return and IWN not far ahead at 10.30%.

EFV

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 6M: 14.03%
• 1Y: 27.68%
• 3Y*: 22.31%
• 5Y*: 12.40%
• 10Y*: 9.83%

IWN

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.27%
• 1Y: 45.20%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: 10.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFV vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	9.98%	42.22%	5.35%	18.85%	-5.22%	11.08%	-2.97%	15.80%	-14.67%	21.22%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	18.97%	12.40%	7.63%	14.56%	-14.77%	27.96%	4.66%	22.01%	-13.01%	7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and IWN is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2005	0.72

The correlation between EFV and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFV vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFV	IWN
Financial Services	36.9%	24.2%
Industrials	10.2%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	2.0%
Basic Materials	7.5%	5.4%
Healthcare	7.2%	8.8%
Energy	7.0%	9.2%
Utilities	5.9%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	8.7%
Communication Services	4.4%	1.6%
Technology	4.3%	12.4%
Real Estate	2.5%	10.2%

Return for Risk

EFV vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV

EFV Risk / Return Rank: 56
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 80
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFV	IWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.56	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.56	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.43	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	5.33	-2.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	17.97	-8.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFV vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFV	IWN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.56	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.32	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.44	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.39	-0.12

Drawdowns

EFV vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, roughly equal to the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and IWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFV	IWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.94%	-61.55%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.90%	-8.45%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.72%	-26.70%	+12.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.84%	-26.70%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.16%	-46.08%	+2.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-0.17%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.83%	-10.16%	-4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	2.51%	+0.40%

Volatility

EFV vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFV	IWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	4.78%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	11.80%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.21%	17.75%	-3.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	21.43%	-5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	23.39%	-5.53%

EFV vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFV vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than IWN's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	3.78%	4.16%	4.66%	4.36%	4.17%	4.07%	2.42%	4.62%	4.56%	3.56%	3.28%	3.59%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.44%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFV and IWN in my portfolio?

EFV and IWN have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFV or IWN?

IWN has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to EFV (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs IWN's -61.55%.

Which ETF is better, EFV or IWN?

On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.30% vs 9.83% for EFV. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFV or IWN?

Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.30% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFV or IWN?

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFV or IWN?

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 1.44% for IWN.

What is the main difference between EFV and IWN?

EFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWN is Small Cap Value Equities. EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.24% for IWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.