PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFRA vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFRA vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFRA achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than KARS's 16.24% return.


EFRA

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
4.96%
6M
4.97%
1Y
10.28%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
10Y*

KARS

1D
-3.32%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
16.24%
6M
17.45%
1Y
69.84%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFRA vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
4.96%13.76%8.09%14.49%7.48%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
16.24%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EFRA and KARS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022

0.52

The correlation between EFRA and KARS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFRA vs. KARS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFRA
KARS

Industrials

61.8%
21.9%

Utilities

24.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
34.3%

Basic Materials

4.4%
26.6%

Technology

2.7%
17.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

EFRA
61.8%
KARS
21.9%

Utilities

EFRA
24.1%
KARS

-

Consumer Cyclical

EFRA
6.3%
KARS
34.3%

Basic Materials

EFRA
4.4%
KARS
26.6%

Technology

EFRA
2.7%
KARS
17.2%

Communication Services

EFRA

-

KARS

-

Consumer Defensive

EFRA

-

KARS

-

Energy

EFRA

-

KARS

-

Financial Services

EFRA

-

KARS

-

Healthcare

EFRA

-

KARS

-

Real Estate

EFRA

-

KARS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFRA vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFRA
EFRA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFRA vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFRAKARSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.43

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

6.97

-6.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

19.68

-17.01

EFRA vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFRA and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFRAKARSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

2.71

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.20

+0.70

Drawdowns

EFRA vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFRA drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRA and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFRAKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-64.85%

+48.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-10.08%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-47.79%

+31.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.98%

-29.15%

+22.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-28.32%

+24.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.56%

+0.29%

Volatility

EFRA vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) is 4.37%, while KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that EFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFRAKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

9.00%

-4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

18.66%

-7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

25.97%

-11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

29.78%

-14.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

29.29%

-13.78%

EFRA vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFRA vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

EFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than KARS's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
4.13%4.34%3.79%1.85%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.16%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFRA and KARS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARS has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to EFRA (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFRA dropped -16.25% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 3-year performance, EFRA leads with 11.21% vs 6.58% for KARS. On fees, EFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EFRA has performed better with a 11.21% return vs 6.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

EFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.16% for KARS.

EFRA tracks FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EFRA and 0.72% for KARS.

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFRA and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer