PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EFRA vs. IDGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EFRA and IDGT is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

EFRA vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.08%
11.48%
EFRA
IDGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EFRA:

0.97

IDGT:

1.06

Sortino Ratio

EFRA:

1.42

IDGT:

1.49

Omega Ratio

EFRA:

1.18

IDGT:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

EFRA:

1.25

IDGT:

0.91

Martin Ratio

EFRA:

3.60

IDGT:

3.70

Ulcer Index

EFRA:

3.52%

IDGT:

5.51%

Daily Std Dev

EFRA:

12.93%

IDGT:

19.17%

Max Drawdown

EFRA:

-15.74%

IDGT:

-77.95%

Current Drawdown

EFRA:

-5.95%

IDGT:

-4.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFRA achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than IDGT's 1.58% return.


EFRA

YTD

1.82%

1M

1.70%

6M

-0.08%

1Y

9.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IDGT

YTD

1.58%

1M

0.86%

6M

11.49%

1Y

17.22%

5Y*

9.17%

10Y*

8.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFRA vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
Expense ratio chart for EFRA: current value at 0.47% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.47%
Expense ratio chart for IDGT: current value at 0.41% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.41%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFRA vs. IDGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFRA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFRA is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFRA is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFRA is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFRA is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFRA is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFRA is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IDGT is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IDGT is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IDGT is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IDGT is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IDGT is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IDGT is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EFRA vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EFRA, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.971.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for EFRA, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.421.49
The chart of Omega ratio for EFRA, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.181.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for EFRA, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.251.53
The chart of Martin ratio for EFRA, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.603.70
EFRA
IDGT

The current EFRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFRA and IDGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.97
1.06
EFRA
IDGT

Dividends

EFRA vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

EFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than IDGT's 1.62% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
3.72%3.79%1.85%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
1.62%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.22%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.76%0.72%0.50%

Drawdowns

EFRA vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFRA drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRA and IDGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-5.95%
-4.32%
EFRA
IDGT

Volatility

EFRA vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) is 3.77%, while iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that EFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.77%
8.13%
EFRA
IDGT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab