EFRA vs. RNRG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG).
EFRA and RNRG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFRA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Nov 1, 2022. RNRG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. It was launched on May 28, 2015. Both EFRA and RNRG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFRA or RNRG.
Correlation
The correlation between EFRA and RNRG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EFRA vs. RNRG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFRA:
0.78
RNRG:
-0.99
EFRA:
1.15
RNRG:
-1.31
EFRA:
1.14
RNRG:
0.85
EFRA:
1.36
RNRG:
-0.35
EFRA:
4.01
RNRG:
-1.61
EFRA:
2.58%
RNRG:
11.89%
EFRA:
13.20%
RNRG:
19.31%
EFRA:
-15.74%
RNRG:
-54.93%
EFRA:
-7.37%
RNRG:
-54.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFRA achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than RNRG's -21.47% return.
EFRA
8.40%
-4.33%
2.54%
9.13%
N/A
N/A
RNRG
-21.47%
-3.67%
-13.25%
-20.61%
-8.49%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFRA vs. RNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than RNRG's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFRA vs. RNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFRA vs. RNRG - Dividend Comparison
EFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than RNRG's 1.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRA iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF | 3.78% | 1.85% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF | 1.69% | 1.43% | 1.15% | 1.10% | 3.17% | 2.96% | 5.24% | 4.14% | 5.02% | 3.48% |
Drawdowns
EFRA vs. RNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFRA drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum RNRG drawdown of -54.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRA and RNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFRA vs. RNRG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.