PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFRA vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFRA vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFRA achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 30.53% return.


EFRA

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.30%
6M
2.85%
YTD
8.79%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.61%

DTCR

1D
-0.90%
1M
-3.58%
6M
12.55%
YTD
30.53%
1Y
47.91%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.41M$38.68M$44.72M
$16.94K$33.04K$24.90K

EFRA vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
8.79%13.76%8.09%14.49%8.75%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
30.53%28.99%14.92%18.93%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EFRA and DTCR is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.60

The correlation between EFRA and DTCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFRA vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFRA
EFRA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFRA vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFRADTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.55

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

8.11

-5.17

EFRA vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFRA and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFRA vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFRA drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRA and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFRADTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-38.98%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-17.88%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-24.96%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-15.15%

+11.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-12.26%

+8.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

5.62%

-1.27%

Volatility

EFRA vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) is 4.18%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that EFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFRADTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

8.80%

-4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

19.77%

-7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

24.75%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

22.50%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

22.25%

-6.70%

EFRA vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFRA vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

EFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than DTCR's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.90%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
4.05%4.34%3.79%1.85%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFRA and DTCR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to EFRA (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFRA dropped -16.25% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 3-year performance, DTCR leads with 27.27% vs 10.86% for EFRA. On fees, EFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 27.27% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTCR.

EFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.90% for DTCR.

EFRA is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while DTCR is REIT. EFRA tracks FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EFRA and 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFRA and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer