PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BN.TO vs. BAM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BN.TOBAM
YTD Return41.51%40.26%
1Y Return65.80%79.63%
Sharpe Ratio2.973.26
Sortino Ratio3.684.06
Omega Ratio1.481.52
Calmar Ratio2.375.65
Martin Ratio19.5416.29
Ulcer Index3.62%5.10%
Daily Std Dev23.68%25.52%
Max Drawdown-83.06%-20.47%
Current Drawdown-3.83%0.00%

Fundamentals


BN.TOBAM
Market CapCA$111.89B$22.94B
EPSCA$0.79$1.12
PE Ratio93.9448.90
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$70.48B$1.11B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$16.59B$684.36M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$25.78B-$11.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between BN.TO and BAM is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BN.TO vs. BAM - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BN.TO having a 41.51% return and BAM slightly lower at 40.26%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
23.68%
39.79%
BN.TO
BAM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BN.TO vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BN.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BN.TO, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BN.TO, currently valued at 3.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BN.TO, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BN.TO, currently valued at 4.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BN.TO, currently valued at 17.20, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0017.20
BAM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAM, currently valued at 3.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAM, currently valued at 4.13, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.13
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAM, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAM, currently valued at 6.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAM, currently valued at 16.27, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0016.27

BN.TO vs. BAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the BAM Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BN.TO and BAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.64
3.32
BN.TO
BAM

Dividends

BN.TO vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison

BN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than BAM's 2.67% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
BN.TO
Brookfield Corporation
0.41%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
2.67%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BN.TO vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than BAM's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN.TO and BAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.52%
0
BN.TO
BAM

Volatility

BN.TO vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) is 6.21%, while Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that BN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.21%
6.65%
BN.TO
BAM

Financials

BN.TO vs. BAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Corporation and Brookfield Asset Management Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. BN.TO values in CAD, BAM values in USD