BN.TO vs. BAM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO).
Performance
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | -10.39% | 15.10% | 56.51% | 26.33% | -16.07% |
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | -13.08% | -4.84% | 51.69% | 42.59% | -12.88% |
Fundamentals
BN.TO:
CA$0.63
BAM.TO:
CA$2.29
BN.TO:
89.77
BAM.TO:
27.01
BN.TO:
1.55
BAM.TO:
13.70
BN.TO:
CA$76.16B
BAM.TO:
CA$4.90B
BN.TO:
CA$23.88B
BAM.TO:
CA$4.64B
BN.TO:
CA$32.85B
BAM.TO:
CA$2.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BN.TO achieves a -10.39% return, which is significantly higher than BAM.TO's -13.08% return.
BN.TO
- 1D
- 4.45%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -11.18%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 25.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.61%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
BAM.TO
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -13.08%
- 6M
- -20.43%
- 1Y
- -8.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BN.TO
BAM.TO
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BN.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | -0.25 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | -0.14 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | -0.26 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | -0.59 | +2.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BN.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | -0.25 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BN.TO and BAM.TO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO - Dividend Comparison
BN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than BAM.TO's 4.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | 0.61% | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.99% | 2.06% | 1.06% | 1.52% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.43% |
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 4.05% | 3.41% | 2.67% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than BAM.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN.TO and BAM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BN.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.06% | -30.79% | -52.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.47% | -30.31% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.83% | -27.15% | +10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -8.41% | -12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.67% | 13.35% | -5.68% |
Volatility
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) at 7.42%. This indicates that BN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BN.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.93% | 7.42% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.46% | 22.14% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.48% | 32.35% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.61% | 30.03% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.09% | 30.03% | -1.94% |
Financials
BN.TO vs. BAM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Corporation and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities