EFG vs. DBAW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EFG (iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFG tracks the MSCI EAFE Growth Index while DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFG returned 7.96%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for DBAW. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

EFG vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EFG has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 7.96%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.

EFG

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 9.06%
• 1Y: 14.40%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 4.23%
• 10Y*: 7.96%

DBAW

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 18.39%
• 1Y: 36.60%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFG vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	7.91%	20.70%	1.53%	17.55%	-23.12%	11.01%	17.85%	27.47%	-12.93%	28.86%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	16.12%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EFG and DBAW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2014	0.83

The correlation between EFG and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFG vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFG	DBAW
Industrials	29.6%	15.0%
Technology	18.1%	18.7%
Healthcare	14.2%	7.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	7.9%
Financial Services	10.6%	24.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	5.3%
Communication Services	4.8%	5.0%
Basic Materials	4.6%	6.8%
Utilities	1.1%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.5%
Energy	0.2%	5.3%

Return for Risk

EFG vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFG

EFG Risk / Return Rank: 25
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFG vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFG	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.86	-2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	3.90	-2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.55	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	4.09	-2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	16.97	-12.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFG vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFG and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFG	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	2.86	-2.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.83	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.75	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.63	-0.34

Drawdowns

EFG vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and DBAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFG	DBAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.40%	-31.44%	-26.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-9.00%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	-14.11%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.78%	-17.87%	-17.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.78%	-31.44%	-4.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-0.51%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.16%	-5.00%	-7.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.16%	+1.30%

Volatility

EFG vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that EFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFG	DBAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	4.71%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.36%	11.00%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.08%	12.88%	+4.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.11%	13.74%	+4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	15.28%	+2.41%

EFG vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFG vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than DBAW's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.29%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	2.34%	2.53%	1.64%	1.63%	1.27%	1.54%	0.85%	1.69%	1.98%	1.56%	2.20%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFG and DBAW in my portfolio?

EFG and DBAW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFG or DBAW?

EFG has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

Which ETF is better, EFG or DBAW?

On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.44% vs 7.96% for EFG. On fees, EFG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFG or DBAW?

Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFG or DBAW?

EFG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFG or DBAW?

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.34% for EFG.

What is the main difference between EFG and DBAW?

EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.41% for DBAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.