EFG vs. IDMO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EFG (iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFG returned 8.96%/yr vs 13.82%/yr for IDMO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.

Performance

EFG vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EFG has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 8.96%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.82% annualized return.

EFG

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 19.63%
• 3Y*: 12.41%
• 5Y*: 4.98%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

IDMO

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 4.29%
• YTD: 12.70%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 30.52%
• 3Y*: 27.60%
• 5Y*: 16.54%
• 10Y*: 13.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFG vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	10.97%	20.70%	1.53%	17.55%	-23.12%	11.01%	17.85%	27.47%	-12.93%	28.86%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	12.70%	42.17%	12.79%	20.16%	-12.03%	14.31%	22.01%	26.09%	-16.66%	29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EFG and IDMO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012	0.65

Over the past year, EFG and IDMO have become more correlated (0.86) than their long-term average of 0.65, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EFG vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFG	IDMO
Industrials	28.3%	21.3%
Technology	20.3%	6.2%
Healthcare	13.2%	1.1%
Financial Services	11.3%	43.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	1.5%
Basic Materials	6.0%	10.6%
Communication Services	5.2%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	2.5%
Utilities	1.5%	7.9%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.8%
Energy	0.5%	1.7%

Return for Risk

EFG vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFG

EFG Risk / Return Rank: 32
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

IDMO

IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 53
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFG vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFG	IDMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.71	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	2.46	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.32	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	2.49	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.68	10.10	-4.42

EFG vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFG and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFG vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and IDMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFG	IDMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.40%	-39.38%	-19.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-12.31%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	-12.65%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.78%	-27.07%	-8.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.78%	-31.34%	-4.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-9.73%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.03%	+0.44%

Volatility

EFG vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) is 6.36%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that EFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFG	IDMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	7.29%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.39%	16.13%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	17.95%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.29%	18.06%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	18.19%	-0.46%

EFG vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFG vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IDMO's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	2.22%	2.53%	1.64%	1.63%	1.27%	1.54%	0.85%	1.69%	1.98%	1.56%	2.20%	1.75%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	4.24%	3.71%	2.24%	2.89%	3.66%	1.81%	1.63%	2.78%	3.27%	3.08%	2.18%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFG and IDMO in my portfolio?

EFG and IDMO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFG or IDMO?

IDMO has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to EFG (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

Which ETF is better, EFG or IDMO?

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 13.82% vs 8.96% for EFG. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EFG has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFG or IDMO?

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 13.82% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFG or IDMO?

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFG or IDMO?

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 2.22% for EFG.

What is the main difference between EFG and IDMO?

EFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.25% for IDMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.