EFG vs. JIG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EFG (iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF) and JIG (JPMorgan International Growth ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EFG is passively managed, while JIG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFG returned 3.90%/yr vs 2.46%/yr for JIG. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EFG charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for JIG.

Performance

EFG vs. JIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than JIG's 10.82% return.

EFG

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -1.78%
• 6M: 2.92%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 1Y: 16.22%
• 3Y*: 10.39%
• 5Y*: 3.90%
• 10Y*: 7.77%
• ALL TIME*: 6.08%

JIG

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -4.61%
• 6M: 4.86%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: 13.27%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	$92.35M	$96.63M	$107.97M
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	$2.14M	$2.55M	$2.81M

EFG vs. JIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	7.44%	20.70%	1.53%	17.55%	-23.12%	11.01%	29.37%
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	10.82%	20.10%	8.84%	13.00%	-30.57%	6.40%	40.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EFG and JIG is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020	0.93

The correlation between EFG and JIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFG vs. JIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFG	JIG
Industrials	27.6%	17.5%
Technology	22.2%	24.8%
Healthcare	13.2%	3.0%
Financial Services	11.0%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	8.2%
Basic Materials	5.6%	4.8%
Communication Services	4.8%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	0.9%
Utilities	1.4%	2.8%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.6%
Energy	0.5%	0.7%

Return for Risk

EFG vs. JIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFG

EFG Risk / Return Rank: 36
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

JIG

JIG Risk / Return Rank: 38
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFG vs. JIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFG	JIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.89	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.34	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.17	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.46	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	4.68	-0.23

EFG vs. JIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the JIG Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFG and JIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFG vs. JIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than JIG's maximum drawdown of -43.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and JIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFG	JIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.40%	-43.75%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-12.94%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	-16.04%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.78%	-43.75%	+7.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-8.39%	+5.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.08%	-16.47%	+4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	4.05%	-0.52%

Volatility

EFG vs. JIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) is 5.68%, while JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that EFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFG	JIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	7.35%	-1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.31%	19.30%	-2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	21.35%	-2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	19.48%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.62%	19.37%	-1.75%

EFG vs. JIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFG has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than JIG's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFG vs. JIG - Dividend Comparison

EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than JIG's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	2.30%	2.53%	1.64%	1.63%	1.27%	1.54%	0.85%	1.69%	1.98%	1.56%	2.20%	1.75%
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	2.03%	2.25%	1.70%	1.69%	0.91%	1.35%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFG and JIG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, EFG and JIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EFG or JIG?

JIG has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to EFG (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs JIG's -43.75%.

Which ETF is better, EFG or JIG?

On 5-year performance, EFG leads with 3.90% vs 2.46% for JIG. On fees, EFG is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, EFG has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFG or JIG?

Over the 5-year period, EFG has performed better with a 3.90% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFG or JIG?

EFG is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFG or JIG?

EFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 2.03% for JIG.

What is the main difference between EFG and JIG?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for EFG and 0.55% for JIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.