PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.


EFAX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.64%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
6.64%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-14.78%23.93%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and SPYG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016

0.65

The correlation between EFAX and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAX vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAX
SPYG

Financial Services

18.6%
8.5%

Technology

11.6%
51.9%

Industrials

9.5%
5.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
8.9%

Basic Materials

3.9%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
1.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
16.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.6%

Energy

1.5%
0.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.2%

Financial Services

EFAX
18.6%
SPYG
8.5%

Technology

EFAX
11.6%
SPYG
51.9%

Industrials

EFAX
9.5%
SPYG
5.0%

Healthcare

EFAX
9.0%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAX
6.1%
SPYG
8.9%

Basic Materials

EFAX
3.9%
SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

EFAX
3.8%
SPYG
1.0%

Communication Services

EFAX
3.2%
SPYG
16.8%

Real Estate

EFAX
1.6%
SPYG
0.6%

Energy

EFAX
1.5%
SPYG
0.1%

Utilities

EFAX
1.2%
SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.48

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

10.25

-4.65

EFAX vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.12

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.76

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.35

+0.17

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-67.63%

+35.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-13.76%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-22.14%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-32.67%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.13%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-24.33%

+17.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.32%

+0.02%

Volatility

EFAX vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.35%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.35%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

12.46%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

16.06%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

21.17%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

20.64%

-3.54%

EFAX vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAX vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.22%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAX and SPYG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.

EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

EFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer