EFAX vs. VXUS
EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAX returned 7.48%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
EFAX vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return.
EFAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
EFAX vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 6.64% | 31.30% | 4.78% | 18.02% | -16.72% | 10.50% | 9.57% | 23.52% | -14.78% | 23.93% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAX and VXUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EFAX and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAX vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAX
VXUS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
EFAX
VXUS
Technology
EFAX
VXUS
Industrials
EFAX
VXUS
Healthcare
EFAX
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
EFAX
VXUS
Basic Materials
EFAX
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
EFAX
VXUS
Communication Services
EFAX
VXUS
Real Estate
EFAX
VXUS
Energy
EFAX
VXUS
Utilities
EFAX
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAX vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
EFAX
VXUS
EFAX vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.85 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 11.14 | -5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.12 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.39 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
EFAX vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -35.97% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -11.27% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -13.58% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.67% | -29.44% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.99% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -8.22% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.88% | +0.46% |
Volatility
EFAX vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) is 5.24%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that EFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 5.60% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 13.00% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 15.21% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 16.05% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 17.16% | -0.06% |
EFAX vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFAX vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.22% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EFAX and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to EFAX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 8.46% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EFAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.
EFAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.
EFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAX and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer