PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EFAV vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EFAV vs. IFLO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, EFAV returned 8.94% vs 32.28% for IFLO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

EFAV vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.

EFAV

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
2.87%
6M
2.52%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
6.44%

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF		2.87%5.90%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF		16.93%13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and IFLO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.75

EFAV vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EFAV
IFLO

Financial Services

19.4%
1.1%

Industrials

15.9%
18.1%

Healthcare

12.0%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
2.8%

Communication Services

9.6%
6.7%

Utilities

8.8%
1.0%

Energy

8.3%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
13.8%

Technology

4.6%
21.5%

Real Estate

3.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.5%
11.3%

Financial Services

EFAV
19.4%
IFLO
1.1%

Industrials

EFAV
15.9%
IFLO
18.1%

Healthcare

EFAV
12.0%
IFLO
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

EFAV
11.9%
IFLO
2.8%

Communication Services

EFAV
9.6%
IFLO
6.7%

Utilities

EFAV
8.8%
IFLO
1.0%

Energy

EFAV
8.3%
IFLO
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAV
5.0%
IFLO
13.8%

Technology

EFAV
4.6%
IFLO
21.5%

Real Estate

EFAV
3.0%
IFLO
0.0%

Basic Materials

EFAV
1.5%
IFLO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF

VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF

Often compared with EFAV:
EFAV vs. EFVEFAV vs. EFAEFAV vs. ACWVEFAV vs. EEMVEFAV vs. USMVEFAV vs. EFASEFAV vs. SPLV
Often compared with IFLO:
IFLO vs. ABIIFLO vs. GLOWIFLO vs. EFASIFLO vs. CFAIFLO vs. CFOIFLO vs. FDTIFLO vs. AVDV

Return for Risk

EFAV vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EFAVIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.85

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.25

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

—

—

EFAV vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and IFLO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EFAVIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-6.44%

-21.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-6.44%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.48%

-3.37%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-1.25%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

—

—

Volatility

EFAV vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EFAVIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

14.75%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.82%

14.75%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.05%

14.75%

-1.70%

EFAV vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAV vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF		3.28%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF		1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EFAV and IFLO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 8.94% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer