PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAV vs. IDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAV vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than IDEV's 9.80% return.


EFAV

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.83%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
5.92%

IDEV

1D
0.80%
1M
2.86%
YTD
9.80%
6M
12.08%
1Y
23.60%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
4.42%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%13.51%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
9.80%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-14.10%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and IDEV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.88

The correlation between EFAV and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAV vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAV
IDEV

Financial Services

19.9%
24.2%

Industrials

15.1%
19.1%

Healthcare

12.4%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
6.0%

Communication Services

9.7%
4.0%

Utilities

9.1%
3.7%

Energy

8.2%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
7.7%

Technology

4.5%
9.9%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
8.0%

Financial Services

EFAV
19.9%
IDEV
24.2%

Industrials

EFAV
15.1%
IDEV
19.1%

Healthcare

EFAV
12.4%
IDEV
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

EFAV
11.5%
IDEV
6.0%

Communication Services

EFAV
9.7%
IDEV
4.0%

Utilities

EFAV
9.1%
IDEV
3.7%

Energy

EFAV
8.2%
IDEV
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAV
5.2%
IDEV
7.7%

Technology

EFAV
4.5%
IDEV
9.9%

Real Estate

EFAV
2.9%
IDEV
2.9%

Basic Materials

EFAV
1.6%
IDEV
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAV vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAVIDEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.29

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.12

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

8.30

-4.08

EFAV vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAVIDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.63

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.54

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.55

-0.02

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and IDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAVIDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-34.77%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-11.20%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-13.41%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

-29.15%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-0.19%

-4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-6.56%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.85%

-0.53%

Volatility

EFAV vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) is 3.14%, while iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAVIDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

4.53%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

12.12%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

14.50%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

16.26%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

17.27%

-4.06%

EFAV vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAV vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than IDEV's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.06%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.10%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAV and IDEV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEV has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to EFAV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.66% vs 6.29% for EFAV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.

IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 3.06% for EFAV.

EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.05% for IDEV.

IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and IDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer