EFAV vs. BKIE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAV tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAV returned 5.82%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for BKIE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.

Performance

EFAV vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 8.73% return.

EFAV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -2.63%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 2.52%
• 1Y: 8.94%
• 3Y*: 12.70%
• 5Y*: 5.82%
• 10Y*: 6.44%

BKIE

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 22.88%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF	2.87%	26.00%	5.30%	12.52%	-15.11%	7.20%	17.71%
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	8.73%	32.08%	4.63%	18.25%	-13.60%	13.75%	34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and BKIE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020	0.88

The correlation between EFAV and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAV vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFAV	BKIE
Financial Services	19.4%	25.9%
Industrials	15.9%	18.2%
Healthcare	12.0%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	11.9%	6.2%
Communication Services	9.6%	4.4%
Utilities	8.8%	3.5%
Energy	8.3%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	7.4%
Technology	4.6%	10.9%
Real Estate	3.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.5%	7.3%

Return for Risk

EFAV vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV

EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 26
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BKIE

BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 49
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFAV	BKIE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.52	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.17	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.27	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	2.01	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.35	7.75	-4.40

EFAV vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and BKIE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAV	BKIE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.56%	-28.19%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-11.41%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.75%	-13.19%	+4.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.46%	-28.19%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-1.38%	-5.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-4.94%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	2.96%	-0.29%

Volatility

EFAV vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) is 3.06%, while BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAV	BKIE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	4.94%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.53%	12.85%	-4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.54%	15.11%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.82%	16.21%	-4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.05%	16.36%	-3.31%

EFAV vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EFAV vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, which matches BKIE's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	3.26%	3.12%	3.31%	2.88%	2.97%	2.58%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF	3.28%	3.20%	3.24%	3.08%	2.53%	2.47%	1.33%	4.19%	3.34%	2.45%	3.94%	2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAV and BKIE in my portfolio?

EFAV and BKIE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAV or BKIE?

BKIE has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to EFAV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

Which ETF is better, EFAV or BKIE?

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.23% vs 5.82% for EFAV. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAV or BKIE?

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAV or BKIE?

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAV or BKIE?

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 3.26% for BKIE.

What is the main difference between EFAV and BKIE?

EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.04% for BKIE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.