EFAD vs. FDT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EFAD (ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAD tracks the MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Index while FDT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFAD returned 4.39%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for FDT. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EFAD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.

Performance

EFAD vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAD achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 15.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAD has underperformed FDT with an annualized return of 4.39%, while FDT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.

EFAD

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 4.60%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 1Y: 10.38%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: 0.66%
• 10Y*: 4.39%
• ALL TIME*: 2.93%

FDT

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -3.04%
• 6M: 5.14%
• YTD: 15.42%
• 1Y: 34.58%
• 3Y*: 23.94%
• 5Y*: 11.15%
• 10Y*: 9.72%
• ALL TIME*: 6.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFAD ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF	$198.37K	$159.48K	$138.70K
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	$17.33M	$12.78M	$12.06M

EFAD vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFAD ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF	6.49%	15.87%	-1.88%	11.91%	-21.34%	8.41%	8.75%	24.66%	-11.71%	22.14%
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	15.42%	52.21%	6.97%	15.03%	-19.51%	11.43%	4.29%	16.82%	-19.98%	34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAD and FDT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2014	0.80

The correlation between EFAD and FDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFAD vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFAD	FDT
Healthcare	20.9%	1.3%
Industrials	14.2%	33.3%
Technology	13.9%	13.1%
Financial Services	12.5%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	2.7%
Basic Materials	9.9%	8.6%
Utilities	7.9%	4.7%
Communication Services	5.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	4.1%	5.1%
Energy	1.3%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.1%

Return for Risk

EFAD vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFAD

EFAD Risk / Return Rank: 31
EFAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EFAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
EFAD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EFAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EFAD Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FDT

FDT Risk / Return Rank: 68
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFAD vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFAD	FDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.67	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	2.26	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.31	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	2.59	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	7.60	-4.18

EFAD vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAD and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFAD vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAD drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAD and FDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAD	FDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.74%	-46.10%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.18%	-13.41%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.35%	-14.29%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.74%	-32.80%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.74%	-46.10%	+10.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-9.49%	+8.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-10.73%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	4.56%	-1.51%

Volatility

EFAD vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) is 3.63%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that EFAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAD	FDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	6.45%	-2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	18.62%	-7.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	20.83%	-7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	18.68%	-4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.33%	18.58%	-3.25%

EFAD vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAD vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

EFAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FDT's 2.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAD ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF	2.57%	2.83%	2.64%	2.29%	1.76%	2.98%	1.49%	2.05%	2.37%	2.42%	2.88%	1.94%
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	2.90%	3.27%	3.89%	4.36%	2.29%	3.80%	2.42%	2.78%	2.13%	1.57%	1.76%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAD and FDT in my portfolio?

EFAD and FDT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAD or FDT?

FDT has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to EFAD (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAD dropped -35.74% vs FDT's -46.10%.

Which ETF is better, EFAD or FDT?

On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 9.72% vs 4.39% for EFAD. On fees, EFAD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EFAD has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAD or FDT?

Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 9.72% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAD or FDT?

EFAD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAD or FDT?

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.57% for EFAD.

What is the main difference between EFAD and FDT?

EFAD tracks MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EFAD and 0.80% for FDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.