EFAD vs. EFA
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA).
EFAD and EFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2014. EFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Aug 14, 2001. Both EFAD and EFA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFAD or EFA.
Correlation
The correlation between EFAD and EFA is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EFAD vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFAD:
0.10
EFA:
0.45
EFAD:
0.22
EFA:
0.71
EFAD:
1.03
EFA:
1.09
EFAD:
0.06
EFA:
0.63
EFAD:
0.31
EFA:
1.74
EFAD:
3.83%
EFA:
3.37%
EFAD:
11.58%
EFA:
12.90%
EFAD:
-35.74%
EFA:
-61.04%
EFAD:
-18.33%
EFA:
-9.30%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAD achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAD has underperformed EFA with an annualized return of 2.53%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.
EFAD
-1.67%
-1.80%
-1.05%
0.25%
0.57%
2.53%
EFA
3.41%
-1.25%
-2.38%
4.98%
4.77%
5.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFAD vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFAD vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFAD vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
EFAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than EFA's 4.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF | 2.45% | 2.29% | 1.76% | 2.98% | 1.49% | 2.05% | 2.37% | 2.42% | 2.88% | 1.93% | 0.61% | 0.00% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.48% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% | 3.72% | 2.54% |
Drawdowns
EFAD vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAD drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAD and EFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFAD vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) is 3.04%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that EFAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.