PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
EFAD vs. FSTA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

EFAD vs. FSTA

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA).

EFAD and FSTA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2014. FSTA is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both EFAD and FSTA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFAD or FSTA.

Correlation

The correlation between EFAD and FSTA is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

EFAD vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

EFAD:

7.98%

FSTA:

3.58%

Max Drawdown

EFAD:

-1.22%

FSTA:

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

EFAD:

-0.84%

FSTA:

-1.09%

Returns By Period

EFAD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FSTA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EFAD vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio.

EFAD
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFAD vs. FSTA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EFAD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFAD is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFAD is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFAD is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFAD is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFAD is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFAD is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
FSTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSTA is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSTA is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSTA is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSTA is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSTA is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSTA is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EFAD vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

EFAD vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison

EFAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than FSTA's 2.17% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EFAD
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF		2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF		2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFAD vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAD drawdown since its inception was -1.22%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -1.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAD and FSTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

EFAD vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...