PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAD vs. EPDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAD achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than EPDPX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAD has underperformed EPDPX with an annualized return of 4.75%, while EPDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.64% annualized return.


EFAD

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.37%
YTD
2.50%
6M
2.81%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
4.75%

EPDPX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
8.44%
6M
8.60%
1Y
36.90%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAD
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
2.50%15.87%-1.88%11.91%-21.34%8.41%8.75%24.66%-11.71%22.14%
EPDPX
EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A
8.44%61.93%0.72%7.46%1.27%7.78%8.83%13.05%-11.02%15.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAD and EPDPX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2014

0.70

The correlation between EFAD and EPDPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAD vs. EPDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAD
EFAD Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
EFAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAD Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

EPDPX
EPDPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EPDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EPDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFADEPDPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.45

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

3.33

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

11.42

-9.96

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the EPDPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAD and EPDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAD drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum EPDPX drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAD and EPDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFADEPDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-39.21%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-10.96%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.35%

-13.15%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.74%

-21.06%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

-33.34%

-2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-7.22%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-11.17%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.19%

-0.07%

Volatility

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) is 3.86%, while EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that EFAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFADEPDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

5.19%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

12.39%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

14.50%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.14%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

14.93%

+0.69%

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EPDPX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAD vs. EPDPX - Dividend Comparison

EFAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than EPDPX's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAD
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
2.81%2.83%2.64%2.29%1.76%2.98%1.49%2.05%2.37%2.42%2.88%1.94%
EPDPX
EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A
6.18%6.55%3.82%3.08%2.56%2.07%1.70%2.43%2.66%2.69%2.24%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAD and EPDPX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPDPX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to EFAD (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAD dropped -35.74% vs EPDPX's -39.21%.

EPDPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAD and EPDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer