EFAD vs. BITU
EFAD (ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Index, while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EFAD returned 10.38% vs -77.50% for BITU. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EFAD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITU.
Performance
EFAD vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAD achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -57.36% return.
EFAD
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 10.38%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.93%
BITU
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- 6M
- -44.05%
- YTD
- -57.36%
- 1Y
- -77.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -33.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.97M | $38.90M | $46.19M | |
| $198.37K | $159.48K | $138.70K |
EFAD vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFAD ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF | 6.49% | 15.87% | -2.85% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -57.36% | -37.07% | 41.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAD and BITU is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAD vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
EFAD
BITU
EFAD vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFAD | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.82 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | -0.93 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | -1.30 | +4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFAD vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAD drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAD and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAD | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -83.45% | +47.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -83.45% | +73.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -80.93% | +80.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -37.68% | +27.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 59.52% | -56.47% |
Volatility
EFAD vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) is 3.63%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that EFAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAD | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 17.53% | -13.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 68.01% | -56.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 88.40% | -74.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 96.01% | -81.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 96.01% | -80.68% |
EFAD vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAD vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
EFAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than BITU's 80.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 80.48% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAD ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF | 2.57% | 2.83% | 2.64% | 2.29% | 1.76% | 2.98% | 1.49% | 2.05% | 2.37% | 2.42% | 2.88% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAD and BITU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to EFAD (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAD dropped -35.74% vs BITU's -83.45%.
On 1-year performance, EFAD leads with 10.38% vs -77.50% for BITU. On fees, EFAD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EFAD has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EFAD has performed better with a 10.38% return vs -77.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 80.48%, compared with 2.57% for EFAD.
EFAD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. EFAD tracks MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EFAD and 0.95% for BITU.
EFAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAD and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer