EET vs. TSMG
EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EET is passively managed, while TSMG is actively managed. Over the past year, EET returned 108.31% vs 292.24% for TSMG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
EET vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 50.58% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 92.52% return.
EET
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 9.26%
- YTD
- 50.58%
- 6M
- 56.34%
- 1Y
- 108.31%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
TSMG
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- 24.82%
- YTD
- 92.52%
- 6M
- 104.85%
- 1Y
- 292.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EET vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 50.58% | 68.06% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 92.52% | 76.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and TSMG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EET and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EET vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
EET
TSMG
EET vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EET | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 8.34 | -4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 27.23 | -12.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EET | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 4.11 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.76 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
EET vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -63.67% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -35.29% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -0.93% | -3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.26% | -16.94% | -20.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 10.79% | -3.61% |
Volatility
EET vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 17.15%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 22.71%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EET | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.15% | 22.71% | -5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.62% | 55.10% | -20.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.74% | 71.76% | -32.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.79% | 80.99% | -43.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.60% | 80.99% | -40.39% |
EET vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EET vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than TSMG's 5.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.26% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 5.96% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EET and TSMG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMG has higher volatility (22.71%) compared to EET (17.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs TSMG's -63.67%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 292.24% vs 108.31% for EET. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 17.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 292.24% return vs 108.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 5.96%, compared with 1.26% for EET.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.75% for TSMG.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EET and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer