PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. SOXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 50.58% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 525.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 10.52%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 64.43% annualized return.


EET

1D
-2.31%
1M
9.26%
YTD
50.58%
6M
56.34%
1Y
108.31%
3Y*
37.59%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
10.52%

SOXL

1D
-6.36%
1M
82.23%
YTD
525.03%
6M
481.71%
1Y
1,280.87%
3Y*
133.82%
5Y*
46.78%
10Y*
64.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
50.58%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
525.03%54.91%-12.31%226.98%-85.66%118.84%70.04%231.83%-39.07%141.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and SOXL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010

0.63

The correlation between EET and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
SOXL

Financial Services

51.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

EET
51.5%
SOXL

-

Basic Materials

EET

-

SOXL

-

Communication Services

EET

-

SOXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

SOXL

-

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

SOXL

-

Energy

EET

-

SOXL

-

Healthcare

EET

-

SOXL

-

Industrials

EET

-

SOXL

-

Real Estate

EET

-

SOXL

-

Technology

EET

-

SOXL
100.0%

Utilities

EET

-

SOXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EETSOXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.69

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

29.80

-25.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

102.14

-87.00

EET vs. SOXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is lower than the SOXL Sharpe Ratio of 12.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and SOXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EETSOXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

12.69

-9.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.44

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.65

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.51

-0.39

Drawdowns

EET vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and SOXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETSOXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-90.46%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-43.47%

+17.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-87.88%

+52.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.88%

-90.46%

+25.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-90.46%

+21.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-6.36%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-35.01%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

12.66%

-5.48%

Volatility

EET vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 17.15%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 41.05%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETSOXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.15%

41.05%

-23.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.62%

81.57%

-46.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.74%

102.16%

-62.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.79%

107.25%

-69.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.60%

99.05%

-58.45%

EET vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EET vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.26%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and SOXL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (41.05%) compared to EET (17.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs SOXL's -90.46%.

On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 64.43% vs 10.52% for EET. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 17.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 64.43% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.75% for SOXL.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.69 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and SOXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer