PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMS vs. FEMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMS vs. FEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than FEMS's 12.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EEMS having a 9.25% annualized return and FEMS not far ahead at 9.39%.


EEMS

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
15.19%
6M
17.20%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
9.25%

FEMS

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
12.25%
6M
11.00%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMS vs. FEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
15.19%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%
FEMS
First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
12.25%16.48%1.88%3.55%1.85%3.76%7.85%28.88%-22.63%49.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and FEMS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2012

0.75

The correlation between EEMS and FEMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMS vs. FEMS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMS
FEMS

Technology

22.7%
13.1%

Industrials

18.9%
16.0%

Financial Services

11.1%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
15.4%

Healthcare

9.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

9.3%
12.0%

Real Estate

5.9%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
7.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.6%

Utilities

2.7%
6.6%

Energy

2.4%
8.7%

Technology

EEMS
22.7%
FEMS
13.1%

Industrials

EEMS
18.9%
FEMS
16.0%

Financial Services

EEMS
11.1%
FEMS
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMS
9.6%
FEMS
15.4%

Healthcare

EEMS
9.4%
FEMS
3.4%

Basic Materials

EEMS
9.3%
FEMS
12.0%

Real Estate

EEMS
5.9%
FEMS
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

EEMS
5.2%
FEMS
7.0%

Communication Services

EEMS
2.9%
FEMS
4.6%

Utilities

EEMS
2.7%
FEMS
6.6%

Energy

EEMS
2.4%
FEMS
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMS vs. FEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMS
FEMS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMS vs. FEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMSFEMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.81

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

7.34

+2.05

EEMS vs. FEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FEMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and FEMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMSFEMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.53

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.25

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.47

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.27

+0.05

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. FEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FEMS drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and FEMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMSFEMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-47.85%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-8.59%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-21.09%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-26.89%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-47.85%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-4.80%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-17.40%

+6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.29%

-0.21%

Volatility

EEMS vs. FEMS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) at 6.03%. This indicates that EEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMSFEMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

6.03%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

12.98%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

15.83%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

17.66%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

19.96%

-1.97%

EEMS vs. FEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMS vs. FEMS - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than FEMS's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.68%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%
FEMS
First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
4.27%4.27%3.97%4.65%4.55%6.25%2.90%4.37%4.68%3.39%2.42%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMS and FEMS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMS has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to FEMS (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMS dropped -48.89% vs FEMS's -47.85%.

On 10-year performance, FEMS leads with 9.39% vs 9.25% for EEMS. On fees, EEMS is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, FEMS has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEMS has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMS is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEMS.

FEMS has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 2.68% for EEMS.

EEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FEMS is Emerging Markets Equities. EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index, while FEMS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for EEMS and 0.80% for FEMS.

EEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMS and FEMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer