PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EE vs. LNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EE vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Excelerate Energy Inc (EE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EE achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 21.68% return.


EE

1D
-0.89%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
16.20%
6M
13.65%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
10Y*

LNG

1D
-0.27%
1M
-13.54%
YTD
21.68%
6M
13.47%
1Y
-2.72%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
23.09%
10Y*
22.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EE vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EE
Excelerate Energy Inc
16.20%-6.29%96.89%-37.97%-6.53%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
21.68%-8.70%27.18%15.02%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EE and LNG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022

0.43

The correlation between EE and LNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EE:

$1.07B

LNG:

$49.55B

EPS

EE:

$2.11K

LNG:

$6.80

PE Ratio

EE:

0.02

LNG:

34.61

PEG Ratio

EE:

0.00

LNG:

0.19

PS Ratio

EE:

0.00

LNG:

2.52

PB Ratio

EE:

0.00

LNG:

13.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

EE:

$434.35B

LNG:

$20.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EE:

$336.42M

LNG:

$5.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

EE:

$66.22B

LNG:

$5.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EE vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EE
EE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EE vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Excelerate Energy Inc (EE) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EELNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.01

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

-0.11

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

-0.24

+0.84

EE vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EE Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EE and LNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EELNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

-0.10

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.16

-0.04

Drawdowns

EE vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EE drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EE and LNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EELNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.57%

-97.84%

+43.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.46%

-24.09%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.19%

-24.87%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.00%

-20.54%

-3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-43.17%

+19.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.81%

11.50%

+5.31%

Volatility

EE vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Excelerate Energy Inc (EE) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 9.55%. This indicates that EE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EELNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

9.55%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.70%

21.72%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.27%

27.62%

+8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.51%

30.27%

+14.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.51%

32.66%

+11.85%

Dividends

EE vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

EE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than LNG's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EE
Excelerate Energy Inc
0.99%1.00%0.45%0.65%0.20%0.00%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.92%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%

Financials

EE vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Excelerate Energy Inc and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B20222023202420252026
433.44B
5.87B
(EE) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EE vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Excelerate Energy Inc and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
EE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Excelerate Energy Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 433.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Excelerate Energy Inc reported an operating income of 81.97B and revenue of 433.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.9%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

EE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Excelerate Energy Inc reported a net income of 68.90B and revenue of 433.44B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EE and LNG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EE has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to LNG (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EE dropped -54.57% vs LNG's -97.84%.

EE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EE and LNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer