PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOG vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOG vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.11% return. Over the past 10 years, EDOG has underperformed PIE with an annualized return of 6.26%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


EDOG

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.44%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
6.26%

PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOG vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
2.43%22.59%1.70%11.58%-10.50%11.71%7.99%13.26%-16.52%20.42%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOG and PIE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2014

0.69

The correlation between EDOG and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDOG vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOG
PIE

Energy

14.0%
5.4%

Industrials

11.9%
16.8%

Communication Services

10.5%
1.4%

Healthcare

10.5%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
0.4%

Basic Materials

9.8%
3.2%

Technology

9.2%
47.0%

Utilities

8.8%
1.3%

Financial Services

7.8%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
1.3%

Real Estate

-

3.6%

Energy

EDOG
14.0%
PIE
5.4%

Industrials

EDOG
11.9%
PIE
16.8%

Communication Services

EDOG
10.5%
PIE
1.4%

Healthcare

EDOG
10.5%
PIE
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

EDOG
9.9%
PIE
0.4%

Basic Materials

EDOG
9.8%
PIE
3.2%

Technology

EDOG
9.2%
PIE
47.0%

Utilities

EDOG
8.8%
PIE
1.3%

Financial Services

EDOG
7.8%
PIE
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EDOG
7.6%
PIE
1.3%

Real Estate

EDOG

-

PIE
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOG vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOG
EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOG vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOGPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.55

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

7.18

-5.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

23.52

-18.74

EDOG vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOG and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOGPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

3.24

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.48

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.12

+0.12

Drawdowns

EDOG vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOGPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-72.98%

+28.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.87%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-28.69%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-40.32%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-40.32%

-3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-1.17%

-7.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-26.08%

+14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.01%

+0.48%

Volatility

EDOG vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is 4.39%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that EDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOGPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

9.00%

-4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

17.77%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

21.91%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

20.23%

-4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

21.35%

-3.75%

EDOG vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOG vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than PIE's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.88%4.50%6.55%6.53%5.07%4.11%2.60%4.93%5.37%2.89%2.97%4.55%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOG and PIE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to EDOG (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.15% vs 6.26% for EDOG. On fees, EDOG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 6.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDOG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 1.70% for PIE.

EDOG is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOG and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer