EDOG vs. DMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV).
EDOG and DMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014. DMDV is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 27, 2018. Both EDOG and DMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EDOG vs. DMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDOG vs. DMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.22% | 22.59% | 1.70% | 11.58% | -10.50% | 11.71% | 7.99% | 13.26% | -4.26% |
DMDV AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.82% | 18.63% | -7.53% | 10.16% | -20.45% | 30.25% | -8.11% |
Returns By Period
EDOG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 11.98%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.00%
DMDV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDOG vs. DMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DMDV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDOG vs. DMDV — Risk / Return Rank
EDOG
DMDV
EDOG vs. DMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOG | DMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOG | DMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOG and DMDV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EDOG vs. DMDV - Dividend Comparison
EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while DMDV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 4.70% | 4.50% | 6.55% | 6.53% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 2.60% | 4.93% | 5.37% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 4.55% |
DMDV AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.51% | 6.98% | 5.60% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 5.36% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EDOG vs. DMDV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOG | DMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.29% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility
EDOG vs. DMDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDOG | DMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.05% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | — | — |