PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOG vs. DMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EDOG vs. DMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EDOG vs. DMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
6.22%22.59%1.70%11.58%-10.50%11.71%7.99%13.26%-4.26%
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%7.82%18.63%-7.53%10.16%-20.45%30.25%-8.11%

Returns By Period


EDOG

1D
0.14%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
6.22%
6M
11.98%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
6.00%

DMDV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EDOG vs. DMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DMDV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EDOG vs. DMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOG
EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DMDV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOG vs. DMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOGDMDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.28

EDOG vs. DMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOGDMDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

Correlation

The correlation between EDOG and DMDV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EDOG vs. DMDV - Dividend Comparison

EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while DMDV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.70%4.50%6.55%6.53%5.07%4.11%2.60%4.93%5.37%2.89%2.97%4.55%
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%3.51%6.98%5.60%4.45%3.13%5.36%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EDOG vs. DMDV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOGDMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

Volatility

EDOG vs. DMDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EDOGDMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.72%