PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOG vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOG vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EDOG has underperformed DIA with an annualized return of 5.78%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


EDOG

1D
-0.30%
1M
4.11%
6M
-1.88%
YTD
4.93%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
5.78%
ALL TIME*
4.41%

DIA

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.65%
6M
8.01%
YTD
9.95%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.05B$1.95B$2.38B
$61.67K$61.90K$58.74K

EDOG vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.93%22.59%1.70%11.58%-10.50%11.71%7.99%13.26%-16.52%20.42%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
9.95%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOG and DIA is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.55

The correlation between EDOG and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDOG vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOG
DIA

Energy

13.5%
1.9%

Industrials

11.6%
18.9%

Healthcare

10.8%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.3%
3.9%

Communication Services

9.8%
5.2%

Technology

9.8%
16.1%

Basic Materials

9.7%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.3%

Utilities

8.1%

-

Financial Services

8.0%
26.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

EDOG
13.5%
DIA
1.9%

Industrials

EDOG
11.6%
DIA
18.9%

Healthcare

EDOG
10.8%
DIA
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

EDOG
10.3%
DIA
3.9%

Communication Services

EDOG
9.8%
DIA
5.2%

Technology

EDOG
9.8%
DIA
16.1%

Basic Materials

EDOG
9.7%
DIA
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EDOG
8.3%
DIA
10.3%

Utilities

EDOG
8.1%
DIA

-

Financial Services

EDOG
8.0%
DIA
26.7%

Real Estate

EDOG

-

DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOG vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDOG
EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDOG vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDOGDIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.12

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

8.21

-4.65

EDOG vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOG and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDOG vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOGDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-51.87%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-9.76%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-15.95%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-20.76%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-36.70%

-7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-1.06%

-5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-7.11%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

2.52%

+2.38%

Volatility

EDOG vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is 3.19%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that EDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOGDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.74%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

9.82%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

12.52%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

14.83%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

17.53%

-0.18%

EDOG vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOG vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than DIA's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.37%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.90%4.50%6.55%6.53%5.07%4.11%2.60%4.93%5.37%2.89%2.97%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOG and DIA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIA has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to EDOG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.26% vs 5.78% for EDOG. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 5.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EDOG.

EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 1.37% for DIA.

EDOG is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.16% for DIA.

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOG and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer