PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.40%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.79%
6M
6.50%
YTD
9.11%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
8.40%
ALL TIME*
3.21%

SCHG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.84%
6M
5.77%
YTD
4.93%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
18.26%
ALL TIME*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
9.11%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.93%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and SCHG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.58

The correlation between EDIV and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDIV vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDIV
SCHG

Financial Services

30.3%
7.7%

Communication Services

14.0%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.2%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
11.2%

Technology

9.7%
44.0%

Industrials

9.2%
7.6%

Real Estate

3.3%
0.6%

Energy

3.2%
0.9%

Utilities

2.4%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.6%

Healthcare

1.4%
9.9%

Financial Services

EDIV
30.3%
SCHG
7.7%

Communication Services

EDIV
14.0%
SCHG
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

EDIV
13.2%
SCHG
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EDIV
11.9%
SCHG
11.2%

Technology

EDIV
9.7%
SCHG
44.0%

Industrials

EDIV
9.2%
SCHG
7.6%

Real Estate

EDIV
3.3%
SCHG
0.6%

Energy

EDIV
3.2%
SCHG
0.9%

Utilities

EDIV
2.4%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

EDIV
1.5%
SCHG
1.6%

Healthcare

EDIV
1.4%
SCHG
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.94

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

3.00

+0.70

EDIV vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-34.59%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-16.41%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-23.39%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-34.59%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-34.59%

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-3.16%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-5.19%

-14.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

5.12%

-1.58%

Volatility

EDIV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 3.83%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

4.47%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

12.82%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

16.43%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

22.40%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

21.57%

-4.27%

EDIV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than SCHG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.16%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.39%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and SCHG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to EDIV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.26% vs 8.40% for EDIV. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.39% for SCHG.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.04% for SCHG.

EDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer