EDIV vs. BKEM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EDIV tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDIV returned 12.06%/yr vs 6.67%/yr for BKEM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.

Performance

EDIV vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 22.14% return.

EDIV

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 2.05%
• 6M: 8.61%
• YTD: 9.97%
• 1Y: 14.33%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

BKEM

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 16.09%
• YTD: 22.14%
• 1Y: 38.83%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	9.97%	16.45%	12.75%	41.91%	-15.31%	11.21%	23.64%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	22.14%	30.55%	7.53%	8.68%	-19.43%	-3.91%	48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and BKEM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020	0.78

The correlation between EDIV and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDIV vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDIV	BKEM
Financial Services	16.4%	16.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.4%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	8.7%
Technology	7.6%	43.0%
Industrials	6.2%	8.1%
Communication Services	5.2%	5.8%
Energy	3.9%	3.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.1%
Utilities	1.7%	2.0%
Basic Materials	0.9%	5.7%
Healthcare	0.1%	2.7%

Return for Risk

EDIV vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV

EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 37
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 67
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDIV	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.70	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	2.22	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.32	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	2.98	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	10.09	-6.04

EDIV vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and BKEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDIV	BKEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.36%	-39.48%	-13.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.36%	-13.11%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	-18.38%	+4.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.32%	-33.89%	+5.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-7.51%	+6.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.25%	-15.80%	-3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	3.86%	-0.32%

Volatility

EDIV vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.16%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDIV	BKEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	10.25%	-6.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.07%	20.99%	-9.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	22.93%	-10.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.95%	19.51%	-5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	19.65%	-2.34%

EDIV vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDIV vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than BKEM's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.92%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	4.13%	4.69%	3.94%	4.26%	4.94%	3.84%	3.52%	3.83%	3.41%	2.99%	4.94%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDIV and BKEM in my portfolio?

EDIV and BKEM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDIV or BKEM?

BKEM has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to EDIV (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

Which ETF is better, EDIV or BKEM?

On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 12.06% vs 6.67% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDIV or BKEM?

Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDIV or BKEM?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDIV or BKEM?

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 1.92% for BKEM.

What is the main difference between EDIV and BKEM?

EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.11% for BKEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.