PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YINN vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YINN vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 61.91% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -19.13%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.


YINN

1D
-0.52%
1M
-10.06%
YTD
-28.25%
6M
-32.42%
1Y
-20.61%
3Y*
-2.89%
5Y*
-38.69%
10Y*
-19.13%

TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-28.25%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and TQQQ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.56

The correlation between YINN and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YINN vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YINN
TQQQ

Financial Services

34.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

27.4%
12.3%

Communication Services

15.7%
15.8%

Energy

5.6%
0.6%

Technology

5.5%
53.8%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.1%

Industrials

2.4%
2.8%

Healthcare

2.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
7.7%

Utilities

0.4%
1.4%

Financial Services

YINN
34.7%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

YINN
27.4%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

YINN
15.7%
TQQQ
15.8%

Energy

YINN
5.6%
TQQQ
0.6%

Technology

YINN
5.5%
TQQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

YINN
4.2%
TQQQ
1.1%

Industrials

YINN
2.4%
TQQQ
2.8%

Healthcare

YINN
2.3%
TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

YINN
1.0%
TQQQ
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

YINN
0.9%
TQQQ
7.7%

Utilities

YINN
0.4%
TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YINN vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YINNTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.39

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

3.60

-4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

11.77

-12.62

YINN vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YINNTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

2.80

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.42

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

0.68

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.74

-0.96

Drawdowns

YINN vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YINNTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.87%

-81.66%

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.74%

-36.97%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.08%

-58.04%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-81.66%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

-81.66%

-16.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.46%

-2.29%

-95.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.48%

-18.52%

-49.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.39%

11.28%

+13.11%

Volatility

YINN vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 21.19% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.35%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YINNTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.19%

13.35%

+7.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.60%

36.04%

+6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.73%

47.60%

+11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.19%

66.50%

+27.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.78%

65.95%

+15.83%

YINN vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

YINN vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than TQQQ's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.39%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YINN and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (21.19%) compared to TQQQ (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs -19.13% for YINN. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs -19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.37% for TQQQ.

YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YINN and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer