PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. SPXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 82.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPXL's 28.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 8.70%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.20% annualized return.


EDC

1D
-3.74%
1M
26.16%
YTD
82.36%
6M
92.21%
1Y
200.25%
3Y*
52.64%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
8.70%

SPXL

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.77%
YTD
28.14%
6M
26.88%
1Y
81.54%
3Y*
52.83%
5Y*
23.51%
10Y*
30.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
82.36%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
28.14%31.94%63.61%69.49%-56.55%98.75%9.64%102.80%-25.11%71.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and SPXL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2008

0.74

The correlation between EDC and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDC vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
SPXL

Technology

32.7%
8.5%

Financial Services

20.8%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
2.2%

Communication Services

7.8%
2.4%

Industrials

7.3%
1.7%

Basic Materials

7.0%
0.4%

Energy

4.4%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
1.1%

Healthcare

3.2%
1.9%

Utilities

2.2%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.4%

Technology

EDC
32.7%
SPXL
8.5%

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
SPXL
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
SPXL
2.2%

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
SPXL
2.4%

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
SPXL
1.7%

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
SPXL
0.4%

Energy

EDC
4.4%
SPXL
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
SPXL
1.1%

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
SPXL
1.9%

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
SPXL
0.6%

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
SPXL
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXL
SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDCSPXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

3.06

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

12.94

+5.75

EDC vs. SPXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the SPXL Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and SPXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDCSPXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38

2.32

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.47

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.57

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.53

-0.48

Drawdowns

EDC vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than SPXL's maximum drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and SPXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCSPXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-76.86%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

-26.77%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-48.95%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.99%

-63.80%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

-76.86%

-10.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.29%

-2.08%

-59.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-15.72%

-49.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.77%

6.32%

+4.45%

Volatility

EDC vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 25.80% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) at 8.49%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCSPXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.80%

8.49%

+17.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.94%

26.67%

+25.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.67%

35.39%

+24.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.68%

50.24%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.69%

53.42%

+7.27%

EDC vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than SPXL's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
0.93%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
0.52%0.69%0.74%0.98%0.32%0.11%0.22%0.84%1.02%3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDC and SPXL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (25.80%) compared to SPXL (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs SPXL's -76.86%.

On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 30.20% vs 8.70% for EDC. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 8.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 30.20% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EDC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.52% for SPXL.

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while SPXL tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.84% for SPXL.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and SPXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer