PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. RETL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. RETL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 42.09% return, which is significantly higher than RETL's 13.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has outperformed RETL with an annualized return of 3.69%, while RETL has yielded a comparatively lower -4.35% annualized return.


EDC

1D
7.65%
1M
-2.11%
6M
12.03%
YTD
42.09%
1Y
96.15%
3Y*
37.61%
5Y*
-1.17%
10Y*
3.69%
ALL TIME*
1.91%

RETL

1D
3.08%
1M
13.44%
6M
4.41%
YTD
13.24%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
-24.30%
10Y*
-4.35%
ALL TIME*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.55M$6.37M$9.21M
$4.05M$4.07M$5.47M

EDC vs. RETL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
42.09%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
13.24%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and RETL is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010

0.49

The correlation between EDC and RETL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDC vs. RETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
RETL

Technology

32.7%
2.7%

Financial Services

20.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
75.2%

Communication Services

7.8%
1.8%

Industrials

7.3%

-

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Energy

4.4%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
18.7%

Healthcare

3.2%
1.6%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

EDC
32.7%
RETL
2.7%

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
RETL

-

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
RETL
75.2%

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
RETL
1.8%

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
RETL

-

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
RETL

-

Energy

EDC
4.4%
RETL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
RETL
18.7%

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
RETL
1.6%

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
RETL

-

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
RETL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. RETL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDC vs. RETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDCRETLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.12

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.73

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

1.43

+5.29

EDC vs. RETL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the RETL Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and RETL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDC vs. RETL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, roughly equal to the maximum RETL drawdown of -92.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and RETL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCRETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-92.00%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.06%

-38.08%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-62.72%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.83%

-92.00%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

-92.00%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.84%

-80.55%

+10.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.37%

-38.01%

-27.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.35%

19.46%

-5.11%

Volatility

EDC vs. RETL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 26.60% compared to Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) at 18.57%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCRETLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.60%

18.57%

+8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.61%

44.27%

+23.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.40%

61.70%

+11.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.52%

79.44%

-19.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.65%

80.09%

-18.44%

EDC vs. RETL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than RETL's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. RETL - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than RETL's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.40%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%0.00%
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.44%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDC and RETL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to RETL (18.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs RETL's -92.00%.

On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 3.69% vs -4.35% for RETL. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 18.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 3.69% return vs -4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EDC has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.44% for RETL.

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.99% for RETL.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and RETL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer