PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. AVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 82.36% return, which is significantly higher than AVES's 16.79% return.


EDC

1D
-3.74%
1M
26.16%
YTD
82.36%
6M
92.21%
1Y
200.25%
3Y*
52.64%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
8.70%

AVES

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.98%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.15%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
82.36%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-6.83%
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
16.79%30.49%4.50%16.79%-16.04%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and AVES is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.93

The correlation between EDC and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDC vs. AVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
AVES

Technology

32.7%
21.4%

Financial Services

20.8%
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.6%

Communication Services

7.8%
5.3%

Industrials

7.3%
13.3%

Basic Materials

7.0%
9.8%

Energy

4.4%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.2%

Healthcare

3.2%
2.1%

Utilities

2.2%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.4%

Technology

EDC
32.7%
AVES
21.4%

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
AVES
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
AVES
9.6%

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
AVES
5.3%

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
AVES
13.3%

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
AVES
9.8%

Energy

EDC
4.4%
AVES
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
AVES
3.2%

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
AVES
2.1%

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
AVES
1.7%

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
AVES
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDCAVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

2.92

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

10.84

+7.84

EDC vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the AVES Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and AVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDCAVESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38

2.19

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.61

-0.56

Drawdowns

EDC vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and AVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCAVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-27.40%

-65.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

-12.90%

-25.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-18.50%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.29%

-1.36%

-59.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-7.73%

-57.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.77%

3.47%

+7.30%

Volatility

EDC vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 25.80% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) at 6.93%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCAVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.80%

6.93%

+18.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.94%

14.44%

+37.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.67%

17.19%

+42.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.68%

16.98%

+39.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.69%

16.98%

+43.71%

EDC vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than AVES's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.81%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
0.93%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EDC and AVES move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EDC has higher volatility (25.80%) compared to AVES (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs AVES's -27.40%.

On 3-year performance, EDC leads with 52.64% vs 20.73% for AVES. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVES has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EDC has performed better with a 52.64% return vs 20.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.93% for EDC.

EDC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and American Century. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.36% for AVES.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and AVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer