ECML vs. IWN
Compare and contrast key facts about EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN).
ECML and IWN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECML is an actively managed fund by Euclidean. It was launched on May 17, 2023. IWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000.
Performance
ECML vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ECML vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 8.76% | 6.82% | 2.37% | 24.36% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 4.91% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 17.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECML achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly higher than IWN's 4.91% return.
ECML
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWN
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 27.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECML vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ECML vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank
ECML
IWN
ECML vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECML | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 1.28 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.86 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.00 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 7.95 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECML | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.28 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.37 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between ECML and IWN is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ECML vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
ECML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than IWN's 1.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 1.26% | 1.38% | 0.98% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
ECML vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECML drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECML and IWN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECML | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -61.55% | +36.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -13.80% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -5.39% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -10.22% | +4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 3.47% | +0.01% |
Volatility
ECML vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is 4.48%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that ECML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ECML | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 6.25% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 12.98% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 21.78% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 21.54% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 23.37% | -4.68% |