ECML vs. TSCV

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

ECML (EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECML charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.

Performance

ECML vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECML achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly lower than TSCV's 20.96% return.

ECML

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 11.12%
• YTD: 17.22%
• 1Y: 26.16%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSCV

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: 14.60%
• YTD: 20.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECML vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	17.22%	3.97%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	20.96%	6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ECML and TSCV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

ECML vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECML

ECML Risk / Return Rank: 71
ECML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ECML Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ECML Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ECML Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ECML Martin Ratio Rank: 71

TSCV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECML vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECML	TSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	—	—

Drawdowns

ECML vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECML drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than TSCV's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECML and TSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECML	TSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.66%	-10.17%	-14.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-1.66%	+1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-1.89%	-3.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ECML	TSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	16.49%	-1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.22%	16.49%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.22%	16.49%	+1.73%

ECML vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECML vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison

ECML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than TSCV's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	1.17%	1.38%	0.98%	0.77%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	0.23%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECML and TSCV in my portfolio?

ECML and TSCV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ECML or TSCV?

On fees, TSCV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECML or TSCV?

TSCV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECML or TSCV?

ECML has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.23% for TSCV.

What is the main difference between ECML and TSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Euclidean and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ECML and 0.60% for TSCV.